LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback

Law
Cite


Cases Referring to this Case | Law Reform Reports Referring to this Case | Law Journal Articles Referring to this Case | Legislation Cited | Cases and Articles Cited

Help

“ those who alleged that the trustee had knowledge of the incumbrance had made it out, not by any evidence of casual conversations, much less by any proof of what would only be constructive notice – but by proof that the mind of the trustee has in some way been brought to an intelligent apprehension of the nature of the incumbrance which has come upon the property, so that a reasonable man, or an ordinary man of business, would act upon the information and would regulate his conduct by it in the execution of the trust ”   flag  1

(1868) LR 3 Ch 488
Law Reports, Chancery Division (3rd Series)
Court of Chancery
United Kingdom

Cases Referring to this Case

Case Name Citation(s) Court †  Jurisdiction Date Full Text Citation Index
Mango Boulevard Pty Ltd v Mio Art Pty Ltd [2016] QCA 148 Supreme Court of Queensland - Court of Appeal Australia - Queensland 7 Jun 2016 AustLII flag 6

LawCite: Privacy | Disclaimers | Conditions of Use | Acknowledgements | Feedback