LawCite Search |
LawCite Markup Tool |
Help |
Feedback
Law Cite |
Case Name | Citation(s) | Court | Jurisdiction † | Date | Full Text | Citation Index | |
R v O ’ Neill |
[1995] QCA 331; |
Supreme Court of Queensland - Court of Appeal | Australia - Queensland | 4 Aug 1995 | AustLII |
|
|
Haddara v R |
[2014] VSCA 100; |
Supreme Court of Victoria - Court of Appeal | Australia - Victoria | 27 May 2014 | AustLII |
|
|
R v Clayton |
[2007] SCC 32; |
Supreme Court of Canada | Canada | 6 Jul 2007 | Supreme Court of Canada |
|
|
R v Burlingham |
[1995] 2 SCR 206; |
Supreme Court of Canada | Canada | 18 May 1995 | Supreme Court of Canada |
|
|
R v b (CR) | [1990] 1 SCR 717 | Supreme Court of Canada | Canada | 12 Apr 1990 | Supreme Court of Canada |
|
|
Thomson Newspapers Ltd v Canada (Director of Investigation and Research, Restrictive Trade Practices Commission) |
[1990] CanLII 135 (SCC); |
Supreme Court of Canada | Canada | 29 Mar 1990 | CanLII |
|
|
R v Corbett |
[1988] CanLII 80 (SCC); |
Supreme Court of Canada | Canada | 26 May 1988 | CanLII |
|
|
Lyons v R | [1984] 2 SCR 633 | Supreme Court of Canada | Canada | 20 Dec 1984 | Supreme Court of Canada |
|
|
R v Commisso | [1983] 2 SCR 121 | Supreme Court of Canada | Canada | 13 Oct 1983 | Supreme Court of Canada |
|
|
Horvath v R | [1979] 2 SCR 376 | Supreme Court of Canada | Canada | 20 Feb 1979 | Supreme Court of Canada |
|
|
Leblanc v R | [1977] 1 SCR 339 | Supreme Court of Canada | Canada | 26 Jun 1975 | Supreme Court of Canada |
|
|
Caccamo v R | [1976] 1 SCR 786 | Supreme Court of Canada | Canada | 6 Mar 1975 | Supreme Court of Canada |
|
|
Vaillancourt v R | [1976] 1 SCR 13 | Supreme Court of Canada | Canada | 13 Feb 1975 | Supreme Court of Canada |
|
|
Hogan v R | [1975] 2 SCR 574 | Supreme Court of Canada | Canada | 12 Jun 1974 | Supreme Court of Canada |
|
|
Wray v R | [1974] SCR 565 | Supreme Court of Canada | Canada | 28 Feb 1973 | Supreme Court of Canada |
|
|
John v R | [1971] SCR 781 | Supreme Court of Canada | Canada | 21 Dec 1970 | Supreme Court of Canada |
|
|
[1977] HKCA 139 (12 September 1977) | [1977] HKCA 139 | Hong Kong Court of Appeal | Hong Kong | 12 Sep 1977 | HKLII |
|
|
Chan Muk-Ching v R | [1977] HKCA 217 | Hong Kong Court of Appeal | Hong Kong | 12 Sep 1977 | HKLII |
|
|
[1977] Hkca 97 (12 July 1977) | [1977] HKCA 97 | Hong Kong Court of Appeal | Hong Kong | 12 Jul 1977 | HKLII |
|
|
[1975] Hkca 74 (8 May 1975) | [1975] HKCA 74 | Hong Kong Court of Appeal | Hong Kong | 8 May 1975 | HKLII |
|
|
R v Wichman |
[2015] NZSC 198; |
Supreme Court of New Zealand | New Zealand | 18 Dec 2015 | NZLII |
|
|
R v Williams |
[2007] NZCA 52; |
Court of Appeal of New Zealand | New Zealand | 7 Mar 2007 | NZLII |
|
|
Criminal Evidence: Police Questioning | [1992] NZLC PP 21 | New Zealand | circa 1992 | NZLII |
|
||
S v Pillay & others | [2003] ZASCA 129 | Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa | South Africa | 28 Nov 2003 | SAFLII |
|
|
Todd v R (The Bahamas) | [2008] UKPC 22 | Privy Council | United Kingdom | 8 Apr 2008 | BAILII |
|
|
Lam Chi Ming (2) Lam Chi Chung and (3) Yam Wai Tong v R Co (Hong Kong) | [1991] UKPC 15 | Privy Council | 27 Mar 1991 | BAILII |
|
Journal Article Title | Citation(s) | Author | Jurisdiction † | Date | Full Text | Citation Index | |
Evidence (Interim) | [1985] ALRC 26 | Australian Law Reform Commission | Australia | circa 1985 | AustLII |
|
|
Criminal Evidence: Police Questioning | [1992] NZLC PP 21 | New Zealand | circa 1992 | NZLII |
|
Journal Article Title | Citation(s) | Author | Jurisdiction † | Date | Full Text | Citation Index | |
Unfinished Business: The Australian Stolen Generations | [2000] MurUEJL 40 | Murdoch University Electronic Journal of Law | Australia | circa 2000 | AustLII |
|
|
"The Poisoned Tree: Inadmissible Confessions, Subsequent Facts and Reliability" | (1991) 4 (3) Canterbury Law Review 356 | Black, John | New Zealand | circa 1991 | NZLII |
|
|
"Section 20 of the Evidence Act 1908 - The Law of Confessions in New Zealand" | [1986] VUWLawRw 16 | Fulton, Kerry W | New Zealand | circa 1986 | NZLII |
|
Legislation Name | Provision |
Evidence Act (ACT) |
Case Name | Citation(s) | Court | Jurisdiction † | Date | Full Text | Citation Index | |
60 WWR 257 |
|
Canada |
|
||||
[1977] HKCA 139 (12 September 1977) | [1977] HKCA 139 | Hong Kong Court of Appeal | Hong Kong | 12 Sep 1977 | HKLII |
|
|
Chan Muk-Ching v R | [1977] HKCA 217 | Hong Kong Court of Appeal | Hong Kong | 12 Sep 1977 | HKLII |
|
|
[1977] Hkca 97 (12 July 1977) | [1977] HKCA 97 | Hong Kong Court of Appeal | Hong Kong | 12 Jul 1977 | HKLII |
|
|
[1975] Hkca 74 (8 May 1975) | [1975] HKCA 74 | Hong Kong Court of Appeal | Hong Kong | 8 May 1975 | HKLII |
|
|
R v Wichman |
[2015] NZSC 198; |
Supreme Court of New Zealand | New Zealand | 18 Dec 2015 | NZLII |
|
|
R v Williams |
[2007] NZCA 52; |
Court of Appeal of New Zealand | New Zealand | 7 Mar 2007 | NZLII |
|
|
Criminal Evidence: Police Questioning | [1992] NZLC PP 21 | New Zealand | circa 1992 | NZLII |
|
||
"The Poisoned Tree: Inadmissible Confessions, Subsequent Facts and Reliability" | (1991) 4 (3) Canterbury Law Review 356 | Black, John | New Zealand | circa 1991 | NZLII |
|
|
"Section 20 of the Evidence Act 1908 - The Law of Confessions in New Zealand" | [1986] VUWLawRw 16 | Fulton, Kerry W | New Zealand | circa 1986 | NZLII |
|
|
S v Pillay & others | [2003] ZASCA 129 | Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa | South Africa | 28 Nov 2003 | SAFLII |
|
|
Todd v R (The Bahamas) | [2008] UKPC 22 | Privy Council | United Kingdom | 8 Apr 2008 | BAILII |
|
|
King v R |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1969 | LexisNexis / Westlaw |
|
||
Myers v DPP |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1965 | LexisNexis / Westlaw |
|
||
[1964] 1 QB 495 |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1964 | LexisNexis / Westlaw |
|
||
R v Payne |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1963 | LexisNexis |
|
||
R v Court |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1962 | Westlaw |
|
||
R v Cook |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1959 | LexisNexis / Westlaw |
|
||
"Confirmation by Subsequent Facts" |
|
Law Quarterly Review | United Kingdom | circa 1956 | Westlaw |
|
|
Kuruma v R |
[1954] UKPC 43; |
Privy Council | United Kingdom | 8 Dec 1954 | BAILII |
|
|
[1952] AC 694 |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1952 | LexisNexis / Westlaw |
|
||
Noor Mohamed v R |
[1948] UKPC 86; |
Privy Council | United Kingdom | 18 Nov 1948 | BAILII |
|
|
Stirland v DPP |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1944 | LexisNexis / Westlaw |
|
||
[1935] AC 309 |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1935 | LexisNexis / Westlaw |
|
||
Thompson v R |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1917 | LexisNexis / Westlaw |
|
||
DPP v Christie |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1914 |
|
|||
[1894] AC 57 |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1894 | LexisNexis / Westlaw |
|
||
R v Warickshall |
[1783] EngR 60; |
United Kingdom | circa 1783 | CommonLII |
|
||
24 Cr App R 15 |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1986 | LexisNexis |
|
||
R v Murphy |
|
United Kingdom - Northern Ireland | circa 1965 | LexisNexis |
|
||
Lam Chi Ming (2) Lam Chi Chung and (3) Yam Wai Tong v R Co (Hong Kong) | [1991] UKPC 15 | Privy Council | 27 Mar 1991 | BAILII |
|