LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback Law Cite

Family Property Law and the Three Fundamental Propositions in Stanford v Stanford     16

Cases Referring to this Journal Article

Case Name	Citation(s)	Court	Jurisdiction	Date	Full Text †		Citation Index
Charlton & Charlton	[2016] FCCA 1846	Federal Circuit Court of Australia	Australia	21 Jul 2016	AustLII
Wang & Gao	[2015] FCCA 1861	Federal Circuit Court of Australia	Australia	7 Jul 2015	AustLII		1
Malave & Ratcliffe	[2015] FCCA 201	Federal Circuit Court of Australia	Australia	5 Feb 2015	AustLII		5
Milic & Lynch	[2014] FCCA 2762	Federal Circuit Court of Australia	Australia	28 Nov 2014	AustLII
Boyle & Boyle	[2014] FCCA 2576	Federal Circuit Court of Australia	Australia	21 Nov 2014	AustLII
Ritter & Ritter	[2014] FCCA 2640	Federal Circuit Court of Australia	Australia	20 Nov 2014	AustLII
Herbert & Borden	[2014] FCCA 2323	Federal Circuit Court of Australia	Australia	13 Oct 2014	AustLII
Kern & Kern	[2014] FCCA 1108	Federal Circuit Court of Australia	Australia	30 May 2014	AustLII
Poole & Poole	[2014] FCCA 757	Federal Circuit Court of Australia	Australia	17 Apr 2014	AustLII
Todd & Todd	[2014] FamCA 101	Family Court of Australia	Australia	27 Feb 2014	AustLII		7
Jackson & O ’ Shea	[2014] FamCA 72	Family Court of Australia	Australia	12 Feb 2014	AustLII		1
Delong & Delong	[2013] FCCA 2102	Federal Circuit Court of Australia	Australia	13 Dec 2013	AustLII
Marriner & Marriner	[2013] FCCA 1765	Federal Circuit Court of Australia	Australia	7 Nov 2013	AustLII
Haggerty & Parry	[2013] FCCA 615	Federal Circuit Court of Australia	Australia	27 Jun 2013	AustLII
Suman v Suman	[2013] FCCA 434	Federal Circuit Court of Australia	Australia	6 Jun 2013	AustLII		1

Law Journal Articles Referring to this Journal Article

Journal Article Title	Citation(s)	Author	Jurisdiction	Date	Full Text †		Citation Index
"Family Property Division And The Principle Of Judicial Restraint"	(2018) 41 University of New South Wales Law Journal 380	Parkinson, Patrick	Australia	circa 2018	AustLII		1