LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback Law Cite

U Sein v Ma Bok    

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name	Citation(s)	Court	Jurisdiction	Date †	Full Text		Citation Index
Air 1931 Cal 555	AIR 1931 Cal 555		India - West Bengal	circa 1931			3
Munshi-- for Appel United "Refineries {Burma) Ltd and lant others--Respondents, Young and Pandit--for Respondents First Appeal No 53 of 1932, Decided Page G J --This appeal must be dis on 23rd January 1933, against judgment missed Although I am not able to ac of Dist Judge, Hanthawaddy, D/- 11th cept in toto the grounds either in law March 1932 or in fact upon which the order of the (a) Civil P C (1908), O 21, R 22--No District Court was based, I am of opin notice, no jurisdiction to sell property A notice under 0 21, R 22 is necessary in ion that the order dismissing the appel order that the Court should obtain jurisdiction lant's application was correct, and must to sell property by way of execution as against be confirmed The appellant applied the legal representative of a deceased judgment- under S 47, Civil P C to the District debtor A sale held in the course of execution proceedings without the issue of a notice to the Court of Hanthawaddy for an order that legal representative of a party in a case in which the execution proceedings in Civil Execu O 21, R 22, applies is irregular and inopera tion No 30 of 1931 and the sale of a tive as against such legal representative: 20 refinery held in the course of the said Cal 370, Foil			India - West Bengal	circa 1928			1
[1926] Cal 1149	[1926] Cal 1149		United States - California	circa 1926			2
[1924] Mad 431	[1924] Mad 431		India	circa 1924			20
Air 1922 Ub 12	AIR 1922 UB 12		Myanmar	circa 1922			1
(1887) 11 Bom 153	(1887) 11 Bom 153		India - Maharashtra	circa 1887			4
Rex v Hipswell	8 B & C 466	Kings Bench	United Kingdom	circa 1928			7
2 P 55	2 P 55			circa 1928			16