LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback Law Cite

Amdumiyan Guljar Patel v Emperor    

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name	Citation(s)	Court †	Jurisdiction	Date	Full Text		Citation Index
Yeluchuri Venkatachennaya v Emperor	[1920] AllINRprMad 141; 27 MLT 178; 43 Mad 511; 21 Cr LJ 402; [1920] AIR Mad 337	All India Reporter - Madras	India - Tamil Nadu	20 Feb 1920	AsianLII		6
54 Cal 5222	54 Cal 5222		United States - California	circa 1920			1
6 Lah 17610	6 Lah 17610		Pakistan	circa 1920			1
73 IC 815	73 IC 815		United Kingdom	circa 1920			1
Air 1914 Mad 45	AIR 1914 Mad 45		India - Tamil Nadu	circa 1914			1
AIR 1923 Lahore 666	AIR 1923 Lahore 666		India - Punjab	circa 1923			1
(1900) 27 Cal 139	(1900) 27 Cal 139		United States - California	circa 1900			4
1 Bom 610	1 Bom 610		India - Maharashtra	circa 1920			3
1 P 22	1 P 22			circa 1920			5
16 Bom 66113	16 Bom 66113		India - Maharashtra	circa 1920			1
Air 1925 Cal 872	AIR 1925 Cal 872		India - West Bengal	circa 1925			1
Air 1926 Bom 551	AIR 1926 Bom 551		India - Maharashtra	circa 1926			2
AIR 1926 Lahore 272	AIR 1926 Lahore 272		India - Punjab	circa 1926			1
Air 1927 Nag 286	AIR 1927 Nag 286		India - Maharashtra	circa 1927			2
22 Mad 49126	22 Mad 49126		India	circa 1920			1
Air 1928 Rang 25	AIR 1928 Rang 25		Myanmar	circa 1928			2
23 Mad 151	23 Mad 151		India	circa 1920			6
Air 1930 Sind 211	AIR 1930 Sind 211		Pakistan	circa 1930			1
27 Cal 13929	27 Cal 13929		United States - California	circa 1920			1
Air 1932 Nag 117	AIR 1932 Nag 117		India - Maharashtra	circa 1932			2
35 CWN 49027	35 CWN 49027		India				1
Air 1935 Rang 135	AIR 1935 Rang 135		Myanmar	circa 1935			1
43 Mad 51114	43 Mad 51114		India	circa 1920			1
[1895] Awn 111	[1895] AWN 111		India - Uttar Pradesh	circa 1895			1
45 Cal 72021	45 Cal 72021		United States - California	circa 1920			1
[1900] Awn 192	[1900] AWN 192		India - Uttar Pradesh	circa 1900			1
50 Bom 74117	50 Bom 74117		India - Maharashtra	circa 1920			1
[1919] Gal 1021	[1919] Gal 1021		United States	circa 1919			1
52 Gal 595	52 Gal 595		United States	circa 1920			1
[1920] Nag 255	[1920] Nag 255		India - Maharashtra	circa 1920			2
59 Bom 35519	59 Bom 35519		India - Maharashtra				1
[1925] Gal 872	[1925] Gal 872		United States	circa 1925			1
16 NLR 91	16 NLR 91		Sri Lanka				4
[1926] Lah 272	[1926] Lah 272		Pakistan	circa 1926			1
17 Allin 16	17 Allin 16		United States - Pennsylvania				1
[1980] CRC 851--126	[1980] CRC 851--126		Canada	circa 1980			1
2 P 81	2 P 81			circa 1920			7
Dattatraya v Pundlik	AIR 1920 Bom 35		India - Maharashtra	circa 1920			2
23 Bom 213	23 Bom 213		India - Maharashtra	circa 1920			6
Evidence Act Maroti, 'Hanya, two of the three Tulsi- Entries in the Village Crime Note Book rams, Gaotia, Dasria, Jhibal and Dhondya are therefore admissible to prove that From the above I conclude that there was certain crimes were reported and registered, ample evidence for the conclusion that a but, of course, they are no proof against gang was in operation, whose object was persons named as suspects in them From the commission of thefts in or near this the above discussion it will be seen that police station area there is good proof of the commission of The prosecution has led evidence about these crimes The next point is whether 19 registered and two unregistered cases the various articles recovered have been of house-breaking of the Tirora station properly identified, and secondly, whether house of dates between 1921 and 1933 it was legal to draw inferences against for which this gang is said to be responsi the accused because of their possession of ble A table giving particulars and show these articles For the appellants it is ing articles recovered and connected with urged that they are mostly articles of egLch case has been given in para 16 of the common daily use and the offences with judgment under appeal while cases have which they are to be connected are none been discussed individually in paras 17 of them more recent than three years : to 41 It is argued that the commission after such a lapse of time the identifica of some of these offences has not been tions are doubtful and no presumption properly proved as entries from the village under S 114, Evidence Act, properly arises, Crime Note Book are inadmissible, and so that the accused should not have been in one case the first information report asked to explain possession, and even if was not proved although it was an exhibit it was allowable to ask them, then they in another case I have checked the proof have given some sort of explanation which given for the existence of these offences, should be accepted On the other hand, with the			India - West Bengal	circa 1920			1
3 Lah 431	3 Lah 431		Pakistan	circa 1920			1
Expl and Dist ]	38 Mad 302		India	circa 1920			4
45 Cal 720	45 Cal 720		United States - California	circa 1920			7
Fakhruddin v Emperor	AIR 1925 Lahore 435		India - Punjab	circa 1925			1
Gallagher v Emperor	AIR 1927 Cal 307		India - West Bengal	circa 1927			1
(1899) 22 Mad 491	(1899) 22 Mad 491		India	circa 1899			3
Govinda v Emperor	AIR 1920 Nag 255		India - Maharashtra	circa 1920			1
166 IC 582	166 IC 582		United Kingdom	circa 1920			2
Muhammad Iusuf v Emperor	AIR 1931 Cal 341		India - West Bengal	circa 1931			3
22 Bom LR 1001	22 Bom LR 1001		India - Maharashtra	circa 1920			1
Nagpur Amdumiyan Guljar Patel v Emperor (FB) (Niyogi, A J G)	[1937] ALT 524		Australia	circa 1937			1
38 Cal 446	38 Cal 446		United States - California	circa 1920			1
Pir Bakush v Emperor	AIR 1923 Lahore 327		India - Punjab	circa 1923			1
52 Cal 59530	52 Cal 59530		United States - California	circa 1920			1
Queen-Empress v Pahuji	19 Bom 195		India - Maharashtra	circa 1920			3
2 P 23	2 P 23			circa 1920			7
Sher Muhammad v Emperor	AIR 1923 Lahore 270		India - Punjab	circa 1923			1
47 Cal 15433	47 Cal 15433		United States - California	circa 1920			1
(1885) 10 Bom 190	(1885) 10 Bom 190		India - Maharashtra	circa 1885			2
Venkatasami v Queen	7 Mad 102		India	circa 1920			1
16 NLR 9	16 NLR 9		Sri Lanka	circa 1920			2
25 Bom 42212	25 Bom 42212		India - Maharashtra	circa 1920			1