LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback

Law
Cite


Cases matching this search | Law Reform Reports matching this search | Law Journal Articles matching this search

Help
Show filtered results

Matching Cases: 2

Case Name Citation(s) †  Court Jurisdiction Date Full Text Citation Index
[1939] FC 43 [1939] FC 43 Federal Court of Canada Canada circa 1939 CanLII flag 8
Ltd "In view of the award passed by the undersigned arbitrators adjudicating upon all their disputes this C P C j-- (a) (**40)*Chitaley, S 115, N 9, Pt 3 suit be dismissed with no order as to costs The (*41) Mulla, Page 420 Pt (p) a * ejectment proceedings taken by Jumo shall likewise (b) ('40) Chitaley, Sch II Para 17, N 3, Pts 3 be dismissed with r o order as to costs ** to 5; Para 20 N 5 Pt 1 Para 21 N 7 i The objections ti ken to this award on behalf of (c) ('40) Chitaley, Sch II Para 21 N 7 the present applicant before the learned Judge in the lower Court were that the award did not decide the dispute between the parties, and it was not an A I R (29) 1942 Sind 45 award because it c id not relate even in part to the subject-matter of the other award under the Arbi Davis 0 J and Weston J, tration Act, that the award was bad, and that it was coloured by matters extraneous to the suit, and Nabibux Muhammad Sulleman and that as it was bad on the face of it, there was no others -- Applicants , award at all We think the two awards must be taken together and that as the first award is found v to be invalid, the second award, which is depen Emperor dant upon the fiist, cannot stand Both clearly Criminal Revn Applns India circa 1939 flag 18

LawCite: Privacy | Disclaimers | Conditions of Use | Acknowledgements | Feedback