LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback Law Cite

Bibi Samsunnehar v Hari Nath    

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name	Citation(s)	Court	Jurisdiction	Date †	Full Text		Citation Index
[1943] Cal 89	[1943] Cal 89		United States - California	circa 1943			2
Note "No second appeal was given with the result that after the said finding of fact '* surrender the rent became Rs 12-l3-5gds and (b) Landlord and tenant--Separate tenancies the plaintiff has claimed in this suit rent at 4 and B amalgamated--Tenant dispossessed by this rate from the year 1342 to the Asar kist landlord from portion of A--Tenant can claim of 1345 The material defences taken by the suspension of rent only of A When two plots of land forming separate tenancies defendant are two in number First of all he with separate assessment of rent are amalgamated so said that the two enhancements of rent of the as to form one tenancy in the eye of law and the parent jama of 50 bighas, namely, the enhance tenant is dispossessed by the landlord from a portion of ment to Rs l3-2-l8gds and subsequently to one of the plots, the tenant cannot claim suspension of the whole rent but only of tbe rent of the plot from Rs 16-5-igd were illegal enhancements, inas a portion of which he has been dispossessed : ( 29) 16 much as those enhancements contravened the			India - West Bengal	circa 1929			2
Carron Iron Co v Maclaren	[1855] EngR 700; (1855) 5 HLCas 416; 10 ER 961	House of Lords	United Kingdom	22 Feb 1866	CommonLII		53
112 IC 71	112 IC 71		United Kingdom	circa 1929			1
36 Cal 233	36 Cal 233		United States - California	circa 1929			3
Chand v Gopal Ram,'	34 Cal 101		United States - California	circa 1929			9