LawCite Search |
LawCite Markup Tool |
Help |
Feedback
Law Cite |
Case Name | Citation(s) | Court | Jurisdiction | Date † | Full Text | Citation Index | |
Chin Choy v Collector of Stamp Duties |
|
Malaysia | circa 1981 | LexisNexis |
|
||
[1942] Mad 558 |
|
India | circa 1942 |
|
|||
Aspinall Curzon Ltd v Khoo Teng Hock |
|
Malaysia | circa 1940 | LexisNexis |
|
||
[1940-2] MLJ 4847 |
|
Malaysia | circa 1940 | LexisNexis |
|
||
Air 1936 Mad 9019 |
|
India - Tamil Nadu | circa 1936 |
|
|||
Air 1936 Mad 901 |
|
India - Tamil Nadu | circa 1936 |
|
|||
[1936] Mad 898 |
|
India | circa 1936 |
|
|||
[1936] Mad 11312 |
|
India | circa 1936 |
|
|||
[1936] Mad 106 |
|
India | circa 1936 |
|
|||
[1936] MWN 859 |
|
India - Tamil Nadu | circa 1936 |
|
|||
Air 1936 Mad 106 |
|
India - Tamil Nadu | circa 1936 |
|
|||
Air 1936 Mad 113 |
|
India - Tamil Nadu | circa 1936 |
|
|||
Words "contract to Sale of mortgaged property set aside underO.21, the contrary' * in S. 82--Meaning of -- Amend R. 89, Civil P. C. -- Compensation payable to ment of 1929 -- Effect of (Ter Full Bench) Mad. 121 = (ยป36) 23 A. I. R. |
|
India | circa 1936 |
|
|||
[1934] Mad 189 |
|
India | circa 1934 |
|
|||
Air 1934 Mad 189 |
|
India - Tamil Nadu | circa 1934 |
|
|||
Air 1932 All 417 |
|
India - Uttar Pradesh | circa 1932 |
|
|||
Air 1932 Mad 218 |
|
India - Tamil Nadu | circa 1932 |
|
|||
Air 1930 PC 183 |
|
Privy Council | India | circa 1930 |
|
||
Air 1941 Mad 66; [1930] PC 183 |
|
India - Tamil Nadu | circa 1930 |
|
|||
Air 1926 Mad 881 |
|
India - Tamil Nadu | circa 1926 |
|
|||
Air 1921 PC 53 |
|
Privy Council | India | circa 1921 |
|
||
Air 1921 Mad 671 |
|
India - Tamil Nadu | circa 1921 |
|
|||
AIR v Padmanabha Iyengar |
|
India | circa 1921 |
|
|||
[1918] Mad 1012 |
|
India | circa 1918 |
|
|||
Kesar Singh v Rel |
|
circa 1914 |
|
||||
[1914] PC 1 |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1914 |
|
|||
Air 1914 All 330 |
|
India - Uttar Pradesh | circa 1914 |
|
|||
Austerberry v Corporation of Oldham |
[1885] UKLawRpCh 142; |
Court of Chancery | United Kingdom | 11 May 1885 | CommonLII |
|
|
Austerberry v Corporation of Oldham |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1885 |
|
|||
(1885) 29 Ch D 75014 |
|
Court of Chancery | United Kingdom | circa 1885 | LexisNexis / Westlaw |
|
|
438 P 439 |
|
circa 1936 |
|
||||
434c P 437 |
|
circa 1936 |
|
||||
202 IC 697 |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1936 |
|
|||
170 IC 762 |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1936 |
|
|||
169 Intl Org 4463 |
|
United States | circa 1936 |
|
|||
163 IC 977 |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1936 |
|
|||
160 IC 686 |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1936 |
|
|||
148 IC 217 |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1936 |
|
|||
137 IC 285 |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1936 |
|
|||
124 IC 911 |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1936 |
|
|||
95 IC 651 |
|
United Kingdom |
|
||||
69 Mad 1216 |
|
India | circa 1936 |
|
|||
66 MLJ 308 |
|
Malaysia | LexisNexis |
|
|||
59 Mad 1216 |
|
India | circa 1936 |
|
|||
59 Mad 121 |
|
India |
|
||||
59 IC 690 |
|
United Kingdom |
|
||||
55 LJCh 638 |
|
Court of Chancery | United Kingdom | circa 1936 |
|
||
51 MLJ 16 |
|
Malaysia | circa 1936 | LexisNexis |
|
||
Eesar Singh v Secretary of State for India, F (s) |
|
India | circa 1936 |
|
|||
46 WR 589 |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1936 |
|
|||
44 Mad 1211 |
|
India | circa 1936 |
|
|||
44 Mad 121 |
|
India |
|
||||
40 Cal 893 |
|
United States - California |
|
||||
39 MLJ 417 |
|
Malaysia | LexisNexis |
|
|||
39 IC 405 |
|
United Kingdom |
|
||||
33 WB 807 |
|
United Kingdom |
|
||||
32 MLJ 347 |
|
Malaysia | LexisNexis |
|
|||
24 Mad 856 |
|
India |
|
||||
24 Mad 855 |
|
India |
|
||||
Judge ex Aiyangcfr |
|
India | circa 1936 |
|
|||
23 IC 339 |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1936 |
|
|||
14 TLR 295 |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1936 | LexisNexis |
|
||
14 IC 179 |
|
United Kingdom |
|
||||
12 Australian Law Journal 394 |
|
Australian Law Journal | Australia | circa 1936 | Legal Online |
|
|
9 Australian Law Journal 499 |
|
Australian Law Journal | Australia | Legal Online |
|