LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback Law Cite

Ch Gauri Shankar v Bhaiya Hari Saran Das    

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name	Citation(s) †	Court	Jurisdiction	Date	Full Text		Citation Index
[1944] Own 253	[1944] OWN 253		Canada - Ontario	circa 1944			1
[1943] Own 516	[1943] OWN 516		Canada - Ontario	circa 1943			1
[1931] Bom 2888	[1931] Bom 2888		India - Maharashtra	circa 1931			1
[1931] Bom 288	[1931] Bom 288		India - Maharashtra	circa 1931			1
[1925] Cal 1151	[1925] Cal 1151		United States - California	circa 1925			2
[1919] Mad 1	[1919] Mad 1		India	circa 1919			2
[1916] PC 49	[1916] PC 49		United Kingdom	circa 1916			5
42 Mad 4071	42 Mad 4071		India				2
42 Mad 407	42 Mad 407		India				2
36 Cal 9364	36 Cal 9364		United States - California				1
36 Cal 936	36 Cal 936		United States - California				7
27 Cal 38	27 Cal 38		United States - California				1
2 P 309	2 P 309						5
2 P 307	2 P 307						6
2 P 301	2 P 301						8
1 P 309	1 P 309						2
1 P 305	1 P 305						3
1 P 304	1 P 304						2
Air 1943 PC 205	AIR 1943 PC 205	Privy Council	India	circa 1943			1
Air 1936 Pat 572	AIR 1936 Pat 572		India - Bihar	circa 1936			1
Sheo "A party who wishes the document to be under Oharan obtained a final decree for sale against stood as being different from what the words suggest the three brothers, for Rs 38,850-3-0 On 3lst should show that the form in which the language is October 1928, the three brothers executed a clothed does not express the real intention of the deed (ex 2) for Rs 42,000 in favour of the parties and that in substance the parties intended that there should be a transaction different from what claimant-appellant The construction of this the language imports In other words there must be deed is the point in dispute between the evidence to show that the parties intended a mortgage parties The appellant obtained mutation of l7('19) 6			India - Tamil Nadu	circa 1919			2