LawCite Search |
LawCite Markup Tool |
Help |
Feedback
Law Cite |
Case Name | Citation(s) | Court | Jurisdiction | Date | Full Text † | Citation Index | |
42 Mad 4071 |
|
India |
|
||||
1 P 304 |
|
|
|||||
Air 1936 Pat 572 |
|
India - Bihar | circa 1936 |
|
|||
Air 1943 PC 205 |
|
Privy Council | India | circa 1943 |
|
||
2 P 301 |
|
|
|||||
[1916] PC 49 |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1916 |
|
|||
2 P 309 |
|
|
|||||
[1919] Mad 1 |
|
India | circa 1919 |
|
|||
36 Cal 936 |
|
United States - California |
|
||||
[1925] Cal 1151 |
|
United States - California | circa 1925 |
|
|||
42 Mad 407 |
|
India |
|
||||
[1931] Bom 288 |
|
India - Maharashtra | circa 1931 |
|
|||
1 P 309 |
|
|
|||||
[1931] Bom 2888 |
|
India - Maharashtra | circa 1931 |
|
|||
27 Cal 38 |
|
United States - California |
|
||||
[1943] Own 516 |
|
Canada - Ontario | circa 1943 |
|
|||
1 P 305 |
|
|
|||||
Sheo "A party who wishes the document to be under Oharan obtained a final decree for sale against stood as being different from what the words suggest the three brothers, for Rs 38,850-3-0 On 3lst should show that the form in which the language is October 1928, the three brothers executed a clothed does not express the real intention of the deed (ex 2) for Rs 42,000 in favour of the parties and that in substance the parties intended that there should be a transaction different from what claimant-appellant The construction of this the language imports In other words there must be deed is the point in dispute between the evidence to show that the parties intended a mortgage parties The appellant obtained mutation of l7('19) 6 | India - Tamil Nadu | circa 1919 |
|
||||
[1944] Own 253 |
|
Canada - Ontario | circa 1944 |
|
|||
2 P 307 |
|
circa 1919 |
|
||||
36 Cal 9364 |
|
United States - California | circa 1919 |
|