|
Fraser v Cooper Hall & Co
|
[1882] UKLawRpCh 97; (1882) 21 Ch D 718
|
Court of Chancery
|
United Kingdom
|
19 Apr 1882
|
CommonLII
|
|
 7
|
|
(1878) 9 Ch D552
|
(1878) 9 Ch D552
|
Court of Chancery
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1878
|
LexisNexis / Westlaw
|
|
2
|
|
24 MLJ 192
|
24 MLJ 192
|
|
Malaysia
|
|
LexisNexis
|
|
2
|
|
8 Times LR28
|
8 Times LR28
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Sayad Anwar v Mohideen Shamsudeen
|
7 AIR Bom 65
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Bhicoobai v Hariba Raghuji
|
6 AIR Bom 141
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Duke of Bedford v Ellis
|
4 AC 1
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
LexisNexis / Westlaw
|
|
3
|
|
1 Times LR622
|
1 Times LR622
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
1 ALR 1995
|
1 ALR 1995
|
|
Australia
|
circa 1995
|
LexisNexis AU
|
|
1
|
|
1 Air Pat 418
|
1 AIR Pat 418
|
|
India - Bihar
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Court " Then follows a long inquiry into the history of the Association with reference to various meetings and the validity of such meetings The learned Judge then holds that neither the petitioners nor the respondents were members of the Association If the respondents were not members of the Association it is difficult to comprehend how they were ever allowed to become parties and put forward objections - It seems to me that the learned Judge in the face of the decisions to which I have invited attention has on an application for a summons, decided the case on its merits In coming to the decision that the plaintiffs could not be given leave to sue under section 16 of the Civil Procedure Code, the learned Judge appears to have been guided by the case of Hadji Saheed Hameed Lebbe v Mohamed Caderpillai Marakayar [2
|
AIR 1925 Mad 985
|
|
India - Tamil Nadu
|
circa 1925
|
|
|
1
|
