Air 1945 Mad 329
|
AIR 1945 Mad 329
|
|
India - Tamil Nadu
|
circa 1945
|
|
|
2
|
[1945] Nag 197
|
[1945] Nag 197
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
circa 1945
|
|
|
1
|
Air 1940 Pat 01246
|
AIR 1940 Pat 01246
|
|
India - Bihar
|
circa 1940
|
|
|
1
|
Mahairam Kamjidas's(1)case ','makes the machinery workable, utres valeat potius quam pereat" We, therefore, think that we should read sub-sec (6), according to the provision of which interest has to be calculated as provided in sub-sec (8) in a manner which makes it workable and thereby prevent the clear intention of sub-sec (8) being defeated Now, how is that best done? As we have (1)
|
(1940) 8 ITR 442; AIR 1940 PC 124
|
Privy Council
|
India
|
circa 1940
|
|
|
|
British Sugar Manufacturers Ltd v Harris
|
(1938) 2 KB 220
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1938
|
LexisNexis / Westlaw
|
|
7
|
Harris
|
(1937) 21 Tax Cas 528
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1937
|
|
|
9
|
[1934] Itr 2362
|
[1934] ITR 2362
|
|
|
circa 1934
|
|
|
2
|
[1934] Itr 236
|
[1934] ITR 236
|
|
|
circa 1934
|
|
|
1
|
189 IC 154
|
189 IC 154
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
2
|
160 IC 862
|
160 IC 862
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
2
|
159 LT 365
|
159 LT 365
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
2
|
107 LJKB 472
|
107 LJKB 472
|
King's Bench
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
2
|
16 IC 465
|
16 IC 465
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
2 P 196
|
2 P 196
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
2 P 195
|
2 P 195
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
2 P 19
|
2 P 19
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
2 Cal 215
|
2 Cal 215
|
|
United States - California
|
|
|
|
2
|