Pringle v Gulf M & or Co
|
212 F2d 632
|
United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
|
United States
|
7 Jun 1954
|
WorldLII
|
|
4
|
Pearson v Baltimore & Ohio R Co
|
200 F2d 569
|
United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
|
United States
|
29 Jan 1953
|
WorldLII
|
|
2
|
Peterson Steels v Seidmon
|
188 F2d 193
|
United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
|
United States
|
20 Apr 1951
|
WorldLII
|
|
21
|
Kirke v Texas Co
|
186 F2d 643
|
United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
|
United States
|
11 Jan 1951
|
WorldLII
|
|
7
|
Chicago Co v Chicago Packaged Fuel Co
|
183 F2d 630
|
United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
|
United States
|
11 Sep 1950
|
WorldLII
|
|
10
|
Grand Trunk Western R Co v Briggs
|
(1942) 112 Ind Apps 360; 42 NE2d 367
|
|
India
|
circa 1942
|
|
|
2
|
Erie R Co v Tompkins
|
304 US 64; 82 L Ed 2d 1188; 82 L Ed 1188; 58 SCt 817; 202 Va 64
|
United States Supreme Court
|
United States
|
25 Apr 1938
|
WorldLII
|
|
3554
|
Co v Miller, Adm'r
|
(1935) 101 Ind Apps 498; 200 NE 78
|
|
India
|
circa 1935
|
|
|
2
|
Co v Van Laningham
|
(1913) 52 Ind Apps 156
|
|
India
|
circa 1913
|
|
|
2
|
Baltimore & OSWR Co v Rosborough
|
(1907) 40 Ind Apps 14
|
|
India
|
circa 1907
|
|
|
2
|
Co v Griffin
|
(1901) 26 Ind Apps 368; 58 NE 503
|
|
India
|
circa 1901
|
|
|
2
|
Pittsburgh, C , C & St L Ry Co v Fraze
|
(1898) 150 Ind 576; 65 Am St Rep 377; 50 NE 576
|
|
United States
|
circa 1898
|
|
|
2
|
Co v Stegemeier, Adm'r
|
(1889) 118 Ind 305; 10 Am St Rep 136; 20 NE 843
|
|
United States
|
circa 1889
|
|
|
4
|
Greenwald v Baltimore & Ohio R Co
|
332 Ill 627; 164 NE 142
|
|
United States - Illinois
|
|
|
|
10
|
Schock v Chappell
|
231 Ind 480
|
|
United States
|
|
|
|
2
|
New York Central RR Co v Milhiser
|
231 Ind 180
|
|
United States
|
|
|
|
2
|
Baltimore & Ohio RR Co v Reyher
|
216 Ind 545; 24 NE2d 284
|
|
United States
|
|
|
|
4
|
Bartley v Chicago & EI Ry Co
|
216 Ind 512; 24 NE2d 405
|
|
United States
|
|
|
|
6
|
Lake Erie & Western R Co v McFarren
|
188 Ind 113; 122 NE 330
|
|
United States
|
|
|
|
4
|
Asher v Ruppa
|
173 F2d 10
|
|
United States
|
|
Westlaw
|
|
41
|
159 f2d 590
|
159 F2d 590
|
|
United States
|
|
Westlaw
|
|
10
|
156 f2d 716
|
156 F2d 716
|
|
United States
|
|
Westlaw
|
|
7
|
Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St Louis RR v Parker
|
132 NE 372; 191 Ind 686
|
|
United States
|
|
|
|
3
|
Central Indiana R Co v Wishard
|
114 NE 970; 186 Ind 262
|
|
United States
|
|
|
|
4
|
Chesapeake & Ohio Ry Co v Williams
|
114 Ind Apps 160; 51 NE2d 384
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
5
|
Pentecost Const Co v O'Donnell
|
112 Ind Apps 47; 39 NE2d 812
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
4
|
109 Ne2d 423
|
109 NE2d 423
|
|
United States
|
|
|
|
2
|
108 Ne2d 57
|
108 NE2d 57
|
|
United States
|
|
|
|
3
|
Kettner v Jay
|
107 Ind Apps 643
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
2
|
New York Central Railroad Co v Milhiser, IndSup
|
106 NE2d 453
|
|
United States
|
|
|
|
3
|
Schlavick v Manhattan Brewing Co , DC
|
103 FSupp 744
|
|
United States
|
|
Westlaw
|
|
3
|
Pennsylvania R Co v Boyd
|
98 Ind Apps 439
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
4
|
97 Ne 573
|
97 NE 573
|
|
United States
|
|
|
|
2
|
80 Ne 869
|
80 NE 869
|
|
United States
|
|
|
|
2
|
Pennsylvania Co v Hensil
|
70 Ind 569
|
|
United States
|
|
|
|
2
|
63 Ne 857
|
63 NE 857; (1902) 158 Ind 494
|
|
United States
|
|
|
|
2
|
Lesnick v Public Industrials Corporation , DC NY
|
51 FSupp 994; 995 Idaho 2
|
|
United States - Idaho
|
|
Westlaw
|
|
4
|
St Louis & SE Ry Co v Mathias
|
50 Ind 65
|
|
United States
|
|
|
|
2
|
Cleveland, C , C & St L Ry Co v Miller
|
49 NE 445; 149 Ind 490
|
|
United States
|
|
|
|
2
|
Pomeroy v Beach
|
49 NE 370; 149 Ind 511
|
|
United States
|
|
|
|
3
|
26 Ne2d 546
|
26 NE2d 546
|
|
United States
|
|
|
|
2
|
McCarthy v M & M Transp Co , DC
|
5 FRD 290
|
|
United States
|
|
|
|
2
|