LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback Law Cite

Hari Sao & Anr v Bihar     3

Cases Referring to this Case

Case Name	Citation(s)	Court	Jurisdiction	Date †	Full Text		Citation Index
Ashok Keshwani & Othrs v MP - McRC--10762/2006	[2007] INMPHC 288	High Court of Madhya Pradesh	India - Madhya Pradesh	10 Apr 2007	LIIofIndia
Union of v Steel Authority of India - Ma	[1996] INORHC 319	High Court of Orissa	India - Orissa	8 May 1996	LIIofIndia
Union of v M/Sjayshree Chemical Ltd - Ma	[1995] INORHC 477	High Court of Orissa	India - Orissa	9 Aug 1995	LIIofIndia

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name	Citation(s)	Court	Jurisdiction	Date †	Full Text		Citation Index
Air 1956 Mad 176	AIR 1956 Mad 176		India - Tamil Nadu	circa 1956			2
F] The 'railway did not run any additional risk or liability in acting upon the representation of the appellants and issuing the receipt because, there would be no presumption that the goods put in the wagon were chillies since the railway did not accept the consignment as such but described as allegedly containing 251 bags of chillies Nor was there any acceptance of the weight of the goods In case of loss the appellants had to prove that they had put on rail 251 bags of chillies with their weight and approximate value, before any liability of the railway could arise under ss 73 and 74 of the Indian Railways Act Under r 15 of the Goods Tariff General Rules the mention of the weight of the goods in the receipt did not amount to an admission in that behalf by the railway, and Rule 22 read with Rule 24(2) only made a false declaration as to goods in a forwarding note subject to the penalty of a fine in addition to the liability to pay for the freight of the goods at the proper rate [828 A-G] 824 Dominion of India v Firm Museram Kishunprad	AIR 1950 Nag 85		India - Maharashtra	circa 1950			2