LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback

Law
Cite


Cases Referring to this Case | Law Reform Reports Referring to this Case | Law Journal Articles Referring to this Case | Legislation Cited | Cases and Articles Cited

Help

Rajah Velugoti Kumara Krishna Yachendravaru v Rajah Velugoti Sarvagna Kumara Krishnayachendra Varu   flag  2

[1969] INSC 311; 1969 3 SCC 282; 1970 3 SCR 88; AIR 1970 SC 1795
Supreme Court of India
India
28th October, 1969

Cases Referring to this Case

Case Name Citation(s) Court Jurisdiction Date †  Full Text Citation Index
Nagesh Bisto Desai v Khando Tirmal Desai [1982] INSC 28; 1982 1 SCALE 418; 1982 2 SCC 79; 1982 3 SCR 341; AIR 1982 SC 887 Supreme Court of India India 2 Mar 1982 LIIofIndia flag 5
Bhaiya Ramanuj Pratap Deo v Lalu Maheshanuj Pratap Deo [1981] INSC 149; [1982] 1 SCR 417; 1981 3 SCALE 1425; AIR 1981 SC 1937 Supreme Court of India India 26 Aug 1981 LIIofIndia flag 1

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name Citation(s) Court Jurisdiction Date †  Full Text Citation Index
[1982] SC 887 [1982] SC 887 United Kingdom - Scotland circa 1982 flag 6
Mirza Raja Shri Pushavathiviziaram Gajapathi Rajmanne Sult v Shri Pushavathi Visweswargajapathi Raj [1963] INSC 62; [1964] 2 SCR 403; AIR 1964 SC 118 Supreme Court of India India 19 Mar 1963 LIIofIndia flag 9
A] Gopala Krishna v Sarvarna Krishna [1955] AWR 590 India - Andhra Pradesh circa 1955 flag 1
[1933] LR Mad 622 [1933] LR Mad 622 India circa 1933 flag 1
State Government In 'relation to properties which have not become so vested in the Government the Madras impartible Estates Act, 1904 continues to be in force Since the Abolition Act did not affect the plaint properties these have continued to be what they were at the time of incorporation with the Zamindari, namely the properties retain their impartible character The principle cossante ratione legis- 89 cessat ipsa lex has no application in the present case for many times custom outlives the condition of things which give it birth The junior members of a joint family in the case of ancient impartible joint family estate take no right in the property by birth and, therefore, have; no right of partition having regard to the nature, of the estate which is impartible [102 D-H, 103 H, 104 E-F] Rai Kishore Singh v Mst Gahanabai AIR 1919 PC 100 Privy Council India circa 1919 flag 2
[1919] PC 100 [1919] PC 100 United Kingdom circa 1919 flag 3
[1889] Exch A-1 [1889] Exch A-1 Court of Exchequer United Kingdom circa 1889 flag 1
Rao v Court of Wards 22 Mad 383 India circa 1919 flag 14
Nargunt Lutchmedavanah v Vengama Naidoo 9 Moore Ind App 66 India circa 1919 flag 6
2 SCR 280 2 SCR 280 circa 1919 2

LawCite: Privacy | Disclaimers | Conditions of Use | Acknowledgements | Feedback