[1982] SC 887
|
[1982] SC 887
|
|
United Kingdom - Scotland
|
circa 1982
|
|
|
6
|
Mirza Raja Shri Pushavathiviziaram Gajapathi Rajmanne Sult v Shri Pushavathi Visweswargajapathi Raj
|
[1963] INSC 62; [1964] 2 SCR 403; AIR 1964 SC 118
|
Supreme Court of India
|
India
|
19 Mar 1963
|
LIIofIndia
|
|
9
|
A] Gopala Krishna v Sarvarna Krishna
|
[1955] AWR 590
|
|
India - Andhra Pradesh
|
circa 1955
|
|
|
1
|
[1933] LR Mad 622
|
[1933] LR Mad 622
|
|
India
|
circa 1933
|
|
|
1
|
State Government In 'relation to properties which have not become so vested in the Government the Madras impartible Estates Act, 1904 continues to be in force Since the Abolition Act did not affect the plaint properties these have continued to be what they were at the time of incorporation with the Zamindari, namely the properties retain their impartible character The principle cossante ratione legis- 89 cessat ipsa lex has no application in the present case for many times custom outlives the condition of things which give it birth The junior members of a joint family in the case of ancient impartible joint family estate take no right in the property by birth and, therefore, have; no right of partition having regard to the nature, of the estate which is impartible [102 D-H, 103 H, 104 E-F] Rai Kishore Singh v Mst Gahanabai
|
AIR 1919 PC 100
|
Privy Council
|
India
|
circa 1919
|
|
|
2
|
[1919] PC 100
|
[1919] PC 100
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1919
|
|
|
3
|
[1889] Exch A-1
|
[1889] Exch A-1
|
Court of Exchequer
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1889
|
|
|
1
|
Rao v Court of Wards
|
22 Mad 383
|
|
India
|
circa 1919
|
|
|
14
|
Nargunt Lutchmedavanah v Vengama Naidoo
|
9 Moore Ind App 66
|
|
India
|
circa 1919
|
|
|
6
|
2 SCR 280
|
2 SCR 280
|
|
|
circa 1919
|
|
|
2
|