LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback

Law
Cite


Cases Referring to this Case | Law Reform Reports Referring to this Case | Law Journal Articles Referring to this Case | Legislation Cited | Cases and Articles Cited

Help

In the Matter of the Petition for Habeas Corpus of Rolando N Abadilla, Susan S Abadilla, in her own behalf and in behalf of the minors June Elizabeth, Rolando, JR , Daphine Jennifer, Ma Theresa, Anna Rosanna, Vincent Marcus and Bart Joseph, all surnamed Abadilla v General Fidel v Ramos, Chief of Staff, Afp; Major General Renato De Villa, Commanding General, Philippine Constabulary & Vice-Chief of Staff, Afp; and Brigadier General Alexander Aguirre, Commanding General, Capcom, PC   flag 

[1987] PHSC 613
Supreme Court of the Philippines
Philippines
1st December, 1987

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name Citation(s) Court Jurisdiction Date †  Full Text Citation Index
Herrera v Enrile, L-40181 (1975) 62 SCRA 547 Supreme Court of the Philippines Philippines circa 1975 flag 9
Tuvera v De Guzman (1965) 13 SCRA 729; 121 Phil 706 Supreme Court of the Philippines Philippines circa 1965 flag 17
United States ex rel Toth v Quarles 350 US 11; 100 L Ed 8; 76 SCt 1 United States Supreme Court United States 9 Feb 1955 WorldLII flag 132
Ex parte Milligan 71 US 2; 4 Wall 2; 18 L Ed 281; 18 L Ed 297 United States Supreme Court United States 1 Dec 1866 WorldLII flag 154
Martin v Ver 123 SCRA 745 Supreme Court of the Philippines Philippines circa 1955 flag 7
Ruffy v Chief of Staff 75 Phil 875 Philippines circa 1955 flag 11
Lat v Philippine Long Distance Telephone Co 69 SCRA 425 Supreme Court of the Philippines Philippines flag 3
Aquino vs Military Commission No 2 63 SCRA 546 Supreme Court of the Philippines Philippines flag 42
Republic v Central Surety and Insurance Co 25 SCRA 641 Supreme Court of the Philippines Philippines flag 16
Rizal Surety & Insurance Co v Manila Railroad Co 16 SCRA 908 Supreme Court of the Philippines Philippines flag 7
11 Page 15 11 Page 15 United Kingdom flag 10
“ For all intents and purposes, it appears that the original decision reached by Commissioner Bissett, largely took into account incorrect information ” 7 Page 3 United Kingdom flag 26
6 Page 43 6 Page 43 United Kingdom flag 4
1 Page 16 1 Page 16 United Kingdom flag 31

LawCite: Privacy | Disclaimers | Conditions of Use | Acknowledgements | Feedback