LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback

Law
Cite


Cases Referring to this Journal Article | Law Reform Reports Referring to this Journal Article | Law Journal Articles Referring to this Journal Article | Legislation Cited | Cases and Articles Cited

Help

"Admissibility of Implied Assertions: Towards a Reliability-based Exception to the Hearsay Rule"   flag  1

(1997) 23 Monash University Law Review 200
Marshall, Brenda
Monash University Law Review
Australia

Law Journal Articles Referring to this Journal Article

Journal Article Title Citation(s) Author Jurisdiction Date †  Full Text Citation Index
"Implied Assertions in Criminal Cases" (2006) 32 Monash University Law Review 47 Williams, C R Australia circa 2006 AustLII flag

Legislation Cited

Legislation Name Provision
Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s59, s72

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name Citation(s) Court Jurisdiction Date †  Full Text Citation Index
Bannon v R [1995] HCA 27; (1995) 185 CLR 1; (1995) 132 ALR 87; (1995) 83 A Crim R 370; (1995) 70 ALJR 25; (1995) 19 Leg Rep C1 High Court of Australia Australia - Commonwealth 9 Nov 1995 AustLII flag 95
"Reliability-Based Approach to Hearsay, The" (1995) 17 Sydney Law Review 522 Sydney Law Review Australia circa 1995 AustLII flag 4
(1995) 14 Utah Law Review 29 (1995) 14 Utah Law Review 29 Utah Law Review United States - Utah circa 1995 HeinOnline / LexisNexis flag 1
"A logical view of the hearsay rule" (1994) 68 Australian Law Journal 724 Australian Law Journal Australia circa 1994 Legal Online flag 3
"Unravelling the Hearsay Riddle: A Novel Approach" (1994) 16 Sydney Law Review 342 Sydney Law Review Australia circa 1994 AustLII flag 2
"Verbal Acts, Res Gestae and Hearsay: A Suggestion for Reform" (1993) 5 Bond Law Review 72 Bond Law Review Australia circa 1993 AustLII flag 1
"Hearsay: Whether and Whither?" (1993) 109 Law Quarterly Review 573 Law Quarterly Review United Kingdom circa 1993 Westlaw flag 4
R v Radford [1993] VICSC 237; (1993) 66 A Crim R 210 Supreme Court of Victoria - Court of Appeal Australia - Victoria circa 1993 AustLII flag 41
"Implied assertions and the hearsay prohibition" (1993) 67 Australian Law Journal 657 Australian Law Journal Australia circa 1993 Legal Online flag 2
Pollitt v R [1992] HCA 35; (1992) 174 CLR 558; (1992) 108 ALR 1; (1992) 66 ALJR 613; (1992) 62 A Crim R 190 High Court of Australia Australia - Commonwealth 13 Aug 1992 AustLII flag 230
R v Astill (1992) 63 A Crim R 148 Australia circa 1992 Legal Online / Westlaw flag 22
R v Miladinovic (1992) 60 A Crim R 206; (1992) 107 FLR 241; (1992) 109 ACTR 11 Australia circa 1992 Legal Online / Westlaw flag 5
"Farewell to Hearsay - Expanding Cracks in the Hearsay Rule" (1989-1990) 17 Melbourne University Law Review 72 Melbourne University Law Review Australia circa 1990 AustLII flag 1
"HillC mon Rediscovered and Lord St ~ e o n a r d Resurrected" (1990) 106 Law Quarterly Review 44 Law Quarterly Review United Kingdom circa 1990 Westlaw flag 1
R v Benz [1989] HCA 64; (1989) 168 CLR 110; 89 ALR 339; 44 A Crim R 1; 64 ALJR 94 High Court of Australia Australia - Commonwealth 14 Dec 1989 AustLII flag 73
Firman v R [1989] SASC 1815; (1989) 52 SASR 391; (1989) 46 A Crim R 150 Supreme Court of South Australia Australia - South Australia 12 Oct 1989 AustLII flag 23
Walton v R [1989] HCA 9; (1989) 166 CLR 283; (1989) 84 ALR 59; (1989) 63 ALJR 226; 38 A Crim R 276 High Court of Australia Australia - Commonwealth 9 Feb 1989 AustLII flag 245
(1989) 186 CLR 283; 293 Idaho 292-3 (1989) 186 CLR 283; 293 Idaho 292-3 Australia - Commonwealth circa 1989 Legal Online / Westlaw flag 1
R v Daylight (1989) 41 A Crim R 354 Australia circa 1989 Legal Online / Westlaw flag 7
"Walton v. The Queen–hearsay revolution?" (1989) 13 Criminal Law Journal 201 Criminal Law Journal Australia circa 1989 Legal Online flag 3
"Implied Assertions and the Scope of the Hearsay Rule" (1973-1974) 9 Melbourne University Law Review 268 Melbourne University Law Review Australia circa 1973 AustLII flag 8
Timbury v Coffee (1941) 66 CLR 283 Australia - Commonwealth circa 1941 Legal Online / Westlaw flag 2
Wright v Doe dem Sandford Tatham [1837] EngR 853; 112 ER 488; (1837) 7 A & E 313 Queen's Bench United Kingdom circa 1837 CommonLII flag 38
594-7 Idaho 610-1; 1 Idaho 622 594-7 Idaho 610-1; 1 Idaho 622 United States - Idaho flag 1
605 Idaho 582 605 Idaho 582 United States - Idaho flag 1
480 Idaho 486 480 Idaho 486 United States - Idaho flag 1
308 Idaho 309 308 Idaho 309 United States - Idaho flag 3
283 Idaho 302 283 Idaho 302 United States - Idaho flag 1
160 Cal 551 160 Cal 551 United States - California flag 1
127 Idaho 1 127 Idaho 1 United States - Idaho flag 2
124 ALR 698 124 ALR 698 Australia LexisNexis AU flag 3
109 Idaho 89 109 Idaho 89 United States - Idaho flag 1
21 Queensland Law Society Journal 407 21 Queensland Law Society Journal 407 Queensland Law Society Journal Australia - Queensland flag 1
14 Idaho 538-40 14 Idaho 538-40 United States - Idaho flag 1
12 Er 488 12 ER 488 United Kingdom CommonLII flag 1
2 WLR 656 2 WLR 656 United Kingdom LexisNexis / Westlaw flag 2
2 SCR 915 2 SCR 915 3
2 Ch 608 2 Ch 608 Court of Chancery United Kingdom LexisNexis / Westlaw flag 10
1 WLR 965 1 WLR 965 United Kingdom LexisNexis / Westlaw flag 6
1 WLR 690 1 WLR 690 United Kingdom LexisNexis / Westlaw flag 1

LawCite: Privacy | Disclaimers | Conditions of Use | Acknowledgements | Feedback