LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback Law Cite

Reef Pacific Trading Ltd v Kama    

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name	Citation(s)	Court	Jurisdiction †	Date	Full Text		Citation Index
Law v- Deamley	[1950] 1 All ER 124		United Kingdom	circa 1950	LexisNexis		7
Day v William Hill (Park Lane) Ltd	[1949] 1 KB 632; [1949] 1 All ER 219		United Kingdom	circa 1949	LexisNexis / Westlaw		89
; Dismore v Milton	[1938] 1 All ER 762		United Kingdom	circa 1938	LexisNexis		1
); or the Statute of Limitations (Murray v Secretary for India	[1931] WN 91		United Kingdom	circa 1931			1
Conquer v Boot	[1928] 2 KB 336; [1928] All ER 120		United Kingdom	circa 1928	LexisNexis / Westlaw		74
Moore v Lawson	(1915) 31 TLR 418		United Kingdom	circa 1915	LexisNexis		92
); nor is the fact that the Statute of Frauds (which is merely a provision as to evidence) might be a bar to the claim (Fraser v Pape	(1904) 91 LT 340		United Kingdom	circa 1904			3
Humphrys v Polak	[1901] UKLawRpKQB 130; [1901] 2 KB 385		United Kingdom	12 Jun 1901	CommonLII		13
South Hetton Coal Co v Haswell, Shotton and Easington Coal and Coke Co	[1898] UKLawRpCh 39; [1898] 1 Ch 465	Court of Chancery	United Kingdom	9 Mar 1898	CommonLII		5
Farnham v Milward & Co	[1895] UKLawRpCh 152; [1895] 2 Ch 730	Court of Chancery	United Kingdom	10 Aug 1895	CommonLII		4
Process of the Court (per Jeune, P , in Young v Holloway	[1895] PP 90		United Kingdom	circa 1895
Bean v Flower	(1895) 73 LT 371		United Kingdom	circa 1895			5
Davey v Bentinck	[1892] UKLawRpKQB 216; [1893] 1 QB 185; 62 LJQB 114		United Kingdom	7 Dec 1892	CommonLII		138
Dreyfus v Peruvian Guano Co	[1889] UKLawRpCh 36; 41 Ch D 151	Court of Chancery	United Kingdom	27 Feb 1889	CommonLII		9
); or if relief be asked on a ground which is no ground for such relief (Johnston v J	33 WR 239		United Kingdom	circa 1904			3
; Wing v Burn	44 TLR 258		United Kingdom	circa 1904	LexisNexis		1