Keith Fearnley v Tenix Defence Systems Pty Ltd
|
[2000] AIRC 943
|
Australian Industrial Relations Commission
|
Australia
|
25 Feb 2000
|
AustLII
|
|
2
|
Wark v Melbourne City Toyota
|
(1999) 89 IR 132
|
|
|
circa 1999
|
|
|
34
|
Australia Meat Holdings Pty Ltd v McLauchlan
|
(1998) 84 IR 1
|
|
|
circa 1998
|
|
|
440
|
AWU-FIME Amalgamated Union v Queensland Alumina Ltd
|
[1995] IRCA 346; (1995) 62 IR 385
|
Industrial Relations Court of Australia
|
Australia
|
17 Jul 1995
|
AustLII
|
|
77
|
A termination may be unjust because, on the evidence before the Commission, the employee was not guilty of the misconduct on which the employer acted Further, a termination may be unreasonable because it was decided on inferences which could not reasonably have been drawn from the material before the employer Even where the findings of an employers enquiry are reasonable the Commission may conclude that a termination of employment on the basis of those findings was harsh because the penalty was disproportionate to the misconduct [Byrne v Australian Airlines Ltd
|
(1995) 185 CLR 410
|
|
Australia - Commonwealth
|
circa 1995
|
Legal Online / Westlaw
|
|
2517
|
84 Ir 1
|
84 IR 1
|
|
|
circa 1995
|
|
|
24
|