LawCite Search |
LawCite Markup Tool |
Help |
Feedback
Law Cite |
Case Name | Citation(s) | Court | Jurisdiction | Date † | Full Text | Citation Index | |
Attorney General ’ s Reference No 3 of 1999 |
[2000] UKHL 63; |
House of Lords | United Kingdom | circa 2000 | BAILII |
|
|
"Why Liberals Should Chuck the Exclusionary Rule" | [1999] University of Illinois Law Review 363 | University of Illinois Law Review | United States | circa 1999 | HeinOnline / LexisNexis |
|
|
Osman v United Kingdom |
|
Australia | circa 1999 | Legal Online / Westlaw |
|
||
Pennsylvania Bd of Probation and Parole v Scott |
524 US 357; |
United States Supreme Court | United States | 22 Jun 1998 | WorldLII |
|
|
If It's Broken, Fix It: Moving Beyond the Exclusionary Rule |
|
Iowa Law Review | United States | circa 1998 | HeinOnline / LexisNexis |
|
|
"Options: An Alternative Perspective on Fourth Amendment Remedies" |
|
Rutgers Law Review | United States | circa 1998 | HeinOnline / LexisNexis |
|
|
(1997) 85 Georgetown Law Journal 821 | (1997) 85 Georgetown Law Journal 821 | Georgetown Law Journal | United States | circa 1997 | HeinOnline / LexisNexis |
|
|
"Recent and proposed statutory reforms to the common law exclusionary discretions" | (1997) 71 Australian Law Journal 119 | Australian Law Journal | Australia | circa 1997 | Legal Online |
|
|
"Fairness & Exclusion of Evidence Under Section 78 Police and Criminal Evidence Act" |
|
Law Quarterly Review | United Kingdom | circa 1997 | Westlaw |
|
|
"Miranda's Social Costs : An Empirical Re-Assessment" | [1996] Northwestern University Law Review 387 | Northwestern University Law Review | United States | circa 1996 | HeinOnline / LexisNexis |
|
|
"A Critique of the Prima Facie Exclusionary Rule" | (1996) 17 New Zealand Universities Law Review 94 | New Zealand Universities Law Review | New Zealand | circa 1996 | Westlaw |
|
|
"Reform : The Police : Testilying : Police Perjury and What to Do About it" | (1996) 67 University of Colorado Law Review 1037 | University of Colorado Law Review | United States | circa 1996 | HeinOnline / LexisNexis |
|
|
[1996] University of California at Los Angeles Law Review 839 | circa 1996 | ||||||
"Covert Policing: A Comparative View" | (1996) 25 (2) Anglo-American Law Review 163 | Anglo-American Law Review | circa 1996 |
|
|||
"Illegality, Entrapment and a New Discretion" |
|
Law Quarterly Review | United Kingdom | circa 1996 | Westlaw |
|
|
"Arizona v Evans: Carving Out Another Good-Faith Exception to the Exclusionary Rule" |
|
Mercer Law Review | United States | circa 1996 | HeinOnline / LexisNexis |
|
|
"Reining in the Judges - An Examination of the Discretions Conferred by the Evidence Acts 1995 - Some Thoughts on the Practical Operation of the New Legislation with Special Emphasis on the New Discretionary Provisions" | (1996) 19 University of New South Wales Law Journal 268 | University of New South Wales Law Journal | Australia | circa 1996 | AustLII |
|
|
"Innocence, Privacy and Targeting in Fourth Amendment Jurisprudence" |
|
Columbia Law Review | United States | circa 1996 | HeinOnline / LexisNexis |
|
|
R v Burlingham |
[1995] 2 SCR 206; |
Supreme Court of Canada | Canada | 18 May 1995 | Supreme Court of Canada |
|
|
R v Nathaniel |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1995 | LexisNexis |
|
||
Ridgeway v R |
[1995] HCA 66; |
High Court of Australia | Australia - Commonwealth | circa 1995 | AustLII |
|
|
R v Cooke |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1995 | LexisNexis |
|
||
R v Bartle |
[1994] 3 SCR 173; |
Supreme Court of Canada | Canada | 29 Sep 1994 | Supreme Court of Canada |
|
|
R v Colarusso | [1994] 1 SCR 20 | Supreme Court of Canada | Canada | 26 Jan 1994 | Supreme Court of Canada |
|
|
"Standing to Challenge Searches and Seizures Under the Charter: The Lessons of the American Experience and Their Application to Canadian Law" | (1994) 52 University of Toronto Faculty of Law Review 39 | University of Toronto Faculty of Law Review | Canada | circa 1994 | HeinOnline / LexisNexis |
|
|
"Improperly Obtained Evidence and Public Policy: An Australian Perspective" | (1994) 43 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 379 | International and Comparative Law Quarterly | United Kingdom | circa 1994 | HeinOnline / Westlaw |
|
|
"The Unruly Exclusionary Rule: Heeding Justice Blackmun's Call to Examine the Rule in Light of Changing Judicial Understanding About Its Effects Outside the Courtroom" |
|
Marquette Law Review | United States | circa 1994 | HeinOnline / LexisNexis |
|
|
R v Hughes |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1994 | LexisNexis / Westlaw |
|
||
R v Smurthwaite & Gill |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1994 | LexisNexis |
|
||
[1994] Crim LR 558 |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1994 | Westlaw |
|
||
R v Khan |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1994 | LexisNexis |
|
||
R v Dersch | [1993] 3 SCR 768 | Supreme Court of Canada | Canada | 21 Oct 1993 | Supreme Court of Canada |
|
|
R v Makwaychuk |
|
Canada | circa 1993 |
|
|||
R v Acciavatti |
|
Canada | circa 1993 |
|
|||
"Confessions and Illegal Conduct by Police" |
|
Law Institute Journal | Australia - Victoria | circa 1993 |
|
||
"The Central Meaning of the Fourth Amendment" | (1993) 35 William and Mary Law Review 197 | William and Mary Law Review | United States | circa 1993 |
|
||
R v Te Kira |
|
New Zealand | circa 1993 | LexisNexis |
|
||
Re Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police v CS Hatfield; MW Thomas; DM Ribush and MR Akbari |
[1992] FCA 43; |
Federal Court of Australia | Australia - Commonwealth | 14 Feb 1992 | AustLII |
|
|
R v Wise |
|
circa 1992 |
|
||||
R v Christou; R v Wright |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1992 | LexisNexis / Westlaw |
|
||
R v Mellenthin |
|
circa 1992 |
|
||||
R v Broyles |
[1991] 3 SCR 595; |
Supreme Court of India | India | 28 Nov 1991 | Supreme Court of Canada |
|
|
R v Elshaw |
|
circa 1991 |
|
||||
R v Klimchuk |
|
Canada | circa 1991 |
|
|||
Thomson Newspapers Ltd v Canada (Director of Investigation and Research, Restrictive Trade Practices Commission) |
[1990] CanLII 135 (SCC); |
Supreme Court of Canada | Canada | 29 Mar 1990 | CanLII |
|
|
R v Quinn |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1990 | Westlaw |
|
||
R v Hebert |
|
Canada | circa 1990 |
|
|||
"Section 78 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984: Middle Ground or No Man's Land?" |
|
Law Quarterly Review | United Kingdom | circa 1990 | Westlaw |
|
|
"Exclusion of Illegally Obtained Evidence: A Comparison of English and American Law" |
|
UMKC Law Review | United States | circa 1989 | HeinOnline / Westlaw |
|
|
"American exclusion of unlawfully obtained evidence with Australian comparison" |
|
Criminal Law Journal | Australia | circa 1989 | Legal Online |
|
|
R v Ross |
|
circa 1989 |
|
||||
"The Looking-Glass World of Section 78" |
|
New Law Journal | United Kingdom | circa 1989 | LexisNexis |
|
|
"The Looking-Glass World of Section 78" |
|
New Law Journal | United Kingdom | circa 1989 | LexisNexis |
|
|
R v Duguay |
|
circa 1989 |
|
||||
R v Delaney |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1989 | LexisNexis |
|
||
R v Parris |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1989 | Westlaw |
|
||
"Improperly Obtained Evidence: a Reconsideration" |
|
Legal Studies | United Kingdom | circa 1989 | Wiley ScienceDirect |
|
|
'fairness' in the English context has become an elusive concept, [89] making it difficult to predict when a Court might detect its presence and exclude evidence In the absence of specific guidelines set down by the judges, some authors have attempted to fill the gap by seeking to identify the policy behind the discretion in a bid to predict with more certainty when fairness will demand that evidence be excluded Professor Richard Stone argues that 'fairness' |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1988 | Westlaw |
|
||
R v Hughes |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1988 | Westlaw |
|
||
R v Jacoy |
|
circa 1988 |
|
||||
R v Absolam |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1988 | Westlaw |
|
||
R v O'Leary |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1988 | LexisNexis |
|
||
R v Samuel |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1988 | LexisNexis / Westlaw |
|
||
R v Simmons |
|
circa 1988 |
|
||||
Schenk v Switzerland |
|
European Court of Human Rights | Europe | circa 1988 |
|
||
"The Use and Abuse of Precedent" |
|
Australian Bar Review | Australia | circa 1988 | LexisNexis AU |
|
|
R v Collins |
[1987] 1 SCR 265; |
Supreme Court of Canada | Canada | 9 Apr 1987 | Supreme Court of Canada |
|
|
R v Mason |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1987 | LexisNexis |
|
||
R v Harris |
|
Canada | circa 1987 |
|
|||
Hamill v R |
|
circa 1987 |
|
||||
Matto v DPP |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1987 | Westlaw |
|
||
Bihar Legal Support Society v the Chief Justice of India & Anr |
[1986] INSC 244; |
Supreme Court of India | India | 19 Nov 1986 | LIIofIndia |
|
|
Williams v R |
[1986] HCA 88; |
High Court of Australia | Australia - Commonwealth | 26 Aug 1986 | AustLII |
|
|
Mickelberg v Director of the Perth Mint |
[1985] WASC 175; |
Supreme Court of Western Australia | Australia - Western Australia | 7 Jun 1985 | AustLII |
|
|
"The Exclusionary Rule and Its Alternatives -- Remedies for Constitutional Violations in Canada and the United States" | (1985) 76 Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 608 | Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology | United States | circa 1985 | HeinOnline |
|
|
"Two Models of the Fourth Amendment" |
|
Michigan Law Review | United States | circa 1985 | HeinOnline / LexisNexis |
|
|
"Tainted proceedings: censuring police illegalities" | (1985) 59 Australian Law Journal 709 | Australian Law Journal | Australia | circa 1985 | Legal Online |
|
|
R v Apicella |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1985 | LexisNexis |
|
||
United States v Leon |
468 US 897; |
United States Supreme Court | United States | 18 Sep 1984 | WorldLII |
|
|
"The Supreme Court's 1983 Term: Individual Rights, Freedom, and the Statue of Liberty," |
|
Georgia Law Review | United States | circa 1984 | HeinOnline / LexisNexis |
|
|
"What Can We Learn From the English Approach to the Problem of Illegally Seized Evidence?" |
|
Judicature | United States | circa 1984 | HeinOnline |
|
|
"Resolving the Dilemma of the Exclusionary Rule: An Application of Restitutive Principles of Justice" |
|
Emory Law Journal | United States | circa 1983 | HeinOnline / LexisNexis |
|
|
Cleland v R |
[1982] HCA 67; |
High Court of Australia | Australia - Commonwealth | 19 Nov 1982 | AustLII |
|
|
"Legislating a Remedy for the Fourth Amendment" | (1982) 23 South Texas Law Journal 585 | South Texas Law Journal | United States - Texas | circa 1982 | Westlaw |
|
|
"The Exclusion of Unfairly Obtained Evidence in England, Canada and Australia" | (1980) 29 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 664 | International and Comparative Law Quarterly | United Kingdom | circa 1980 | HeinOnline / Westlaw |
|
|
Helliwell v Piggott-Sims |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1980 |
|
|||
R v Sang |
[1979] UKHL 3; |
House of Lords | United Kingdom | 25 Jul 1979 | BAILII |
|
|
Michigan v DeFillippo |
443 US 31; |
United States Supreme Court | United States | 25 Jun 1979 | WorldLII |
|
|
Rakas v Illinois |
439 US 128; |
United States Supreme Court | United States | 15 Jan 1979 | WorldLII |
|
|
Bunning v Cross |
[1978] HCA 22; |
High Court of Australia | Australia - Commonwealth | 14 Jun 1978 | AustLII |
|
|
Jeffrey v Black |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1978 | LexisNexis / Westlaw |
|
||
R v Houghton |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1978 | LexisNexis |
|
||
"Excluding Evidence as Protecting Rights" |
|
Criminal Law Review | United Kingdom | circa 1977 | Westlaw |
|
|
United States v Janis |
428 US 433; |
United States Supreme Court | United States | 4 Oct 1976 | WorldLII |
|
|
Stone v Powell |
428 US 465; |
United States Supreme Court | United States | 4 Oct 1976 | WorldLII |
|
|
United States v Peltier |
422 US 531; |
United States Supreme Court | United States | 25 Jun 1975 | WorldLII |
|
|
Michigan v Tucker |
417 US 433; |
United States Supreme Court | United States | 10 Jun 1974 | WorldLII |
|
|
United States v Calandra |
414 US 338; |
United States Supreme Court | United States | 8 Jan 1974 | WorldLII |
|
|
"The Limits of the Exclusionary Rule" |
|
Stanford Law Review | United States | circa 1974 | HeinOnline / LexisNexis |
|
|
"Search and Seizure: An Empirical Study of the Exclusionary Rule and its Alternatives" | (1973) 21 Journal of Legal Studies 243 | Journal of Legal Studies | United States | circa 1973 | HeinOnline / Westlaw |
|
|
Bivens v Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics |
403 US 388; |
United States Supreme Court | United States | 21 Jun 1971 | WorldLII |
|
|
R v Ireland |
[1970] HCA 21; |
High Court of Australia | Australia - Commonwealth | 3 Jul 1970 | AustLII |
|
|
R v Wray |
(1970) 4 CCC 1; |
Supreme Court of Canada | Canada | 26 Jun 1970 | Supreme Court of Canada |
|
|
King v R |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1969 | LexisNexis / Westlaw |
|
||
"The Effect of Mapp v Ohio on Police Search-and Seizure Practices in Narcotics Cases" | (1968) 4 Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems 98 | Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems | United States | circa 1968 | HeinOnline / LexisNexis |
|
|
R v Maqsud Ali, R v Ashiq Hussain |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1966 | LexisNexis / Westlaw |
|
||
Collis v Gunn |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1964 | LexisNexis / Westlaw |
|
||
R v Payne |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1963 | LexisNexis |
|
||
Kuruma v R |
[1954] UKPC 43; |
Privy Council | United Kingdom | 8 Dec 1954 | BAILII |
|
|
R v Lee |
[1950] HCA 25; |
High Court of Australia | Australia - Commonwealth | 23 Jun 1950 | AustLII |
|
|
Wolf v Colorado |
338 US 25; |
United States Supreme Court | United States | 27 Jun 1949 | WorldLII |
|
|
McDermott v R |
[1948] HCA 23; |
High Court of Australia | Australia - Commonwealth | circa 1948 | AustLII |
|
|
Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation |
[1947] EWCA Civ 1; |
England and Wales Court of Appeal - Civil Division | United Kingdom - England and Wales | 10 Nov 1947 | BAILII |
|
|
Hollington v Hewthorn |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1943 | LexisNexis / Westlaw |
|
||
Nardone v United States |
308 US 338; |
United States Supreme Court | United States | 11 Dec 1939 | WorldLII |
|
|
Silverthorne Lumber Co v United States |
251 US 385; |
United States Supreme Court | United States | 26 Jan 1920 | WorldLII |
|
|
R v Leatham |
30 LJQB 205; |
Queen's Bench | United Kingdom | circa 1861 | WorldLII |
|
|
United States v Bayless |
|
United States | circa 1988 | Westlaw |
|
||
United States v Bayless |
|
United States | circa 1988 | Westlaw |
|
||
State v Jurrell |
|
United States | circa 1988 |
|
|||
US v Krull |
|
United States Supreme Court | United States | circa 1988 | Westlaw |
|
|
Nix v Williams |
|
United States Supreme Court | United States | circa 1988 | Westlaw |
|
|
403 US 420-24 |
|
United States Supreme Court | United States | circa 1988 | Westlaw |
|
|
Wong Sun v US |
|
United States Supreme Court | United States | Westlaw |
|
||
Mapp v Ohio |
|
United States Supreme Court | United States | Westlaw |
|
||
United States v Garsson |
|
circa 1988 |
|
||||
People v Defore |
|
United States - New York | circa 1988 |
|
|||
Weeks v United States |
|
United States Supreme Court | United States | Westlaw |
|
||
State v Aime |
|
United States |
|
||||
Adams v New York |
|
United States Supreme Court | United States | Westlaw |
|
||
Arizona v Evans |
|
Canada - Quebec |
|
||||
"Fourth Amendment First Principles" |
|
Harvard Law Review | United States | circa 1988 | HeinOnline / LexisNexis |
|
|
"Studying the Exclusionary Rule in Search and Seizure" | 37 University of Chicago Law Review 665 | University of Chicago Law Review | United States | circa 1988 | HeinOnline / LexisNexis |
|
|
See |
28 USC 1291; |
United States Code | United States | circa 1988 | LII (Cornell) |
|