LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback

Law
Cite


Cases Referring to this Case | Law Reform Reports Referring to this Case | Law Journal Articles Referring to this Case | Legislation Cited | Cases and Articles Cited

Help

Commissioner of Police (NSW) v Davies   flag  4

[2000] NSWSC 107; 111 A Crim R 451
Supreme Court of New South Wales
Australia - New South Wales
3rd March, 2000

Cases Referring to this Case

Case Name Citation(s) Court Jurisdiction Date †  Full Text Citation Index
Sharp v Registrar of Firearms; Sharp Shooters Pty Ltd v Registrar of Firearms [2018] SADC 105 District Court of South Australia Australia - South Australia 19 Oct 2018 AustLII flag
Balodis v Registrar of Firearms [2012] SADC 113 District Court of South Australia Australia - South Australia 7 Sep 2012 AustLII flag 4
Glen v Registrar of Firearms [2011] SADC 22 District Court of South Australia Australia - South Australia 28 Feb 2011 AustLII flag 5

Law Journal Articles Referring to this Case

Journal Article Title Citation(s) Author Jurisdiction Date †  Full Text Citation Index
"DownUnderAllOver: Developments around the country" (2000) 25 (2) Alternative Law Journal 90 Editors Australia circa 2000 AustLII flag 1

Legislation Cited

Legislation Name Provision
Constitution
War Crimes Act 1945 (Cth)
War Crimes Amendment Act 1988 (Cth)
Firearms Act 1996 (NSW) s11
Firearms Act 1989 (NSW)

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name Citation(s) Court Jurisdiction Date †  Full Text Citation Index
Polyukhovich v Commonwealth [1991] HCA 32; (1991) 172 CLR 501; (1991) 101 ALR 545; 65 ALJR 521; 91 ILR 1 High Court of Australia Australia - Commonwealth 14 Aug 1991 AustLII flag 483
Rodway v R [1990] HCA 19; (1990) 169 CLR 515; (1990) 92 ALR 385; (1990) 64 ALJR 305; 47 A Crim R 426 High Court of Australia Australia - Commonwealth 24 May 1990 AustLII flag 273
"The rule at common law is that a statute ought not to be given a retrospective operation where to do so would affect an existing right or obligation unless the language of the statute expressly or by necessary implication requires such construction It is said that statutes dealing with procedure are an exception to the rule and that they should be given a retrospective operation It would, we think, be more accurate to say that there is no presumption against retrospectivity in the case of statutes which affect mere matters of procedure " Australia - Commonwealth Legal Online / Westlaw flag 1

LawCite: Privacy | Disclaimers | Conditions of Use | Acknowledgements | Feedback