Cases Referring to this Case | Law Reform Reports Referring to this Case | Law Journal Articles Referring to this Case | Legislation Cited | Cases and Articles Cited

Help

Broken Hill Pty Co Ltd v Zunic 16

[2001] NSWSC 561; (2001) 22 NSWCCR 92; (2001) 122 IR 170

Supreme Court of New South Wales

Australia - New South Wales

5th July, 2001

Cases Referring to this Case

Case Name	Citation(s)	Court	Jurisdiction	Date †	Full Text		Citation Index
Bogan v The Estate of Peter John Smedley (Deceased)	[2023] VSCA 256	Supreme Court of Victoria - Court of Appeal	Australia - Victoria	26 Oct 2023	AustLII		3
Baker v Morona	[2021] VSC 643	Supreme Court of Victoria	Australia - Victoria	6 Oct 2021	AustLII		2
Langton v Western Sydney Local Health District	[2017] ACTSC 352	Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory	Australia - Australian Capital Territory	23 Nov 2017	AustLII		2
Bateman v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd	[2013] ACTSC 72; 8 ACTLR 13	Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory	Australia - Australian Capital Territory	26 Apr 2013	AustLII		15
Fokas v Halik Corporation Pty Ltd	[2011] NSWSC 1565	Supreme Court of New South Wales	Australia - New South Wales	16 Dec 2011	AustLII
PRD Realty Pty Ltd v King	[2007] NSWSC 734	Supreme Court of New South Wales	Australia - New South Wales	9 Jul 2007	AustLII		3
Slater & Gordon Pty Ltd v Porteous	[2005] VSC 398	Supreme Court of Victoria	Australia - Victoria	3 Oct 2005	AustLII		21
AMACA Pty Ltd v Harris	[2005] NSWSC 622; (2005) 2 DDCR 569	Supreme Court of New South Wales	Australia - New South Wales	28 Jun 2005	AustLII		9
Regit (No 2) Pty Ltd v Bendyk	[2005] NSWSC 450; (2005) 2 DDCR 539	Supreme Court of New South Wales	Australia - New South Wales	10 May 2005	AustLII		3
Motor Trade Finances Prestige Leasing Pty Ltd v Elderslie Finance Corporation Ltd	[2005] VSC 360	Supreme Court of Victoria	Australia - Victoria	15 Apr 2005	AustLII		3
BHP Billiton Ltd v Schultz	[2004] HCA 61; (2004) 211 ALR 523; (2004) 79 ALJR 348; (2004) 2 DDCR 78; [2004] Aust Torts Reports 81-776; (2004) 221 CLR 400	High Court of Australia	Australia - Commonwealth	7 Dec 2004	AustLII		225
Amaca Pty Ltd v Brisbane City Council	[2004] NSWSC 574	Supreme Court of New South Wales	Australia - New South Wales	1 Jul 2004	AustLII
BHP Billiton Ltd v Schultz	[2003] HCATrans 512	High Court of Australia	Australia - Commonwealth	4 Dec 2003	AustLII		1
Fisher v Marin and Women's and Children's Hospital, Adelaide	[2003] NSWSC 530	Supreme Court of New South Wales	Australia - New South Wales	18 Jun 2003	AustLII
BHP Billiton Ltd v Schultz	[2002] NSWSC 981	Supreme Court of New South Wales	Australia - New South Wales	22 Oct 2002	AustLII		6
RESI Corporation v Sinclair	[2002] NSWCA 123; (2002) 54 NSWLR 387; (2002) 23 NSWCCR 486	Supreme Court of New South Wales - Court of Appeal	Australia - New South Wales	7 May 2002	AustLII		4

Legislation Cited

s5, s8

Legislation Name	Provision
Dust Diseases Tribunal Act 1989 (NSW)	s8, s10, s11, s12, s12A, s12B, s12D, s13, s25, s25A, s25B
Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-Vesting) Act 1987 (NSW)

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name	Citation(s)	Court	Jurisdiction	Date †	Full Text		Citation Index
Hearn v Commonwealth	[2000] NSWDDT 12; (2000) 21 NSWCCR 203	Dust Diseases Tribunal of New South Wales	Australia - New South Wales	6 Dec 2000	AustLII		4
James Hardie & Coy Pty Ltd v Barry	[2000] NSWCA 353; (2000) 50 NSWLR 357; (2000) 21 NSWCCR 150	Supreme Court of New South Wales - Court of Appeal	Australia - New South Wales	4 Dec 2000	AustLII		171
Hayward v Barratt	[2000] NSWSC 708	Supreme Court of New South Wales	Australia - New South Wales	11 Jul 2000	AustLII		9
Goliath Portland Cement Co Ltd v Bengtell	(1994) 33 NSWLR 414; (1994) 10 NSWCCR 200		Australia - New South Wales	circa 1994	LexisNexis AU		43
Bankinvest AG v Seabrook	(1988) 14 NSWLR 711		Australia - New South Wales	circa 1988	LexisNexis AU		341
Distillers Co (Biochemicals) Ltd v Thompson	[1971] AC 458; [1971] 1 All ER 694; [1971] 2 WLR 441		United Kingdom	circa 1971	LexisNexis / Westlaw		152
" It can be seen to be highly desirable that the judicial administration of the day to day working of the cross-vesting scheme is not encumbered by an encrustation of judge-made pronouncements of principles to be applied when considering making a transfer order It calls for what I might describe as a `nuts and bolts' management decision as to which court, in the pursuit of the interests of justice, is the more appropriate to hear and determine the substantive dispute Consideration of textured principle and deep learning - in particular principles of international law such as forum non conveniens - have no place in a cross-vesting adjudication "			Australia - New South Wales		LexisNexis AU		1

LawCite: Privacy | Disclaimers | Conditions of Use | Acknowledgements | Feedback