Cases Referring to this Case | Law Reform Reports Referring to this Case | Law Journal Articles Referring to this Case | Legislation Cited | Cases and Articles Cited

Help

Interpretación prejudicial de los art culos 82 literal h), 83 literales a) y e) y 84 de la Decisión 344 de la Comisión del Acuerdo de Cartagena, solicitada por la Primera Sala del Tribunal de lo Contencioso Administrativo, Distrito de Quito, República del Ecuador. Actor: DICOMEX S.A. Marca: "GALLO + GRAFICA" (PROCESO Nº 80-IP-2002)

Court of Justice of the Andean Community

International

2nd October, 2002

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name	Citation(s)	Court	Jurisdiction	Date †	Full Text		Citation Index
5 Equitable Lawyer 10	5 Equitable Lawyer 10	Equitable Lawyer	United Kingdom				2
3 Equitable Lawyer 25	3 Equitable Lawyer 25	Equitable Lawyer	United Kingdom				2
2 Equitable Lawyer 21	2 Equitable Lawyer 21	Equitable Lawyer	United Kingdom				3
1 Equitable Lawyer 7	1 Equitable Lawyer 7	Equitable Lawyer	United Kingdom				1

LawCite: Privacy | Disclaimers | Conditions of Use | Acknowledgements | Feedback