Bioid v Ohim
|
[2005] ECR I-0000
|
|
Europe
|
circa 2005
|
|
|
135
|
Henkel
|
[2004] ECR I-0000
|
|
Europe
|
circa 2004
|
|
|
166
|
New Look v Ohim - Naulover (Nlsport, Nljeans, Nlactive and Nlcollection)
|
[2004] ECR II-0000
|
|
Europe
|
circa 2004
|
|
|
69
|
Laboratorios RTB v OHIM - Giorgio Beverly Hills (GIORGIO AIRE)
|
[2003] ECR II-2789
|
|
Europe
|
circa 2003
|
|
|
9
|
Mystery Drinks v OHIM - Karlsberg Brauerei (MYSTERY)
|
[2003] ECR II-43
|
|
Europe
|
circa 2003
|
|
|
18
|
Unilever v OHIM (Ovoid tablet) [2003] ECR II
|
|
|
|
circa 2003
|
|
|
|
Matratzen Concord v OHIM - Hukla Germany (MATRATZEN)
|
[2002] EUECJ T-6/01; [2003] ETMR 31; [2002] ECR II-4335
|
Court of Justice of the European Communities
|
Europe
|
23 Oct 2002
|
BAILII
|
|
87
|
Lloyd Schuhfabrik Meyer
|
[1999] ECR I-3819
|
|
Europe
|
circa 1999
|
|
|
255
|
Sabel
|
[1997] EUECJ C-251/95; [1998] RPC 199; [1998] ETMR 1; [1998] CEC 315; [1998] 1 CMLR 445; [1997] ECR I-6191
|
Court of Justice of the European Communities
|
Europe
|
11 Nov 1997
|
BAILII
|
|
338
|