|
Murray NO v National Consumer Commission , Auction Alliance (Pty) Ltd v National Consumer Commission (NCT/4454/2012/101(1)(P)CPA, NCT/4570/2012/101(1)(P)CPA)
|
[2012] ZANCT 17
|
|
South Africa
|
30 Jul 2012
|
SAFLII
|
|
 3
|
|
Vodacom Service Provider Co (Pty) Ltd v National Consumer Commission Case
|
[2012] ZANCT 9
|
|
South Africa
|
8 Jun 2012
|
SAFLII
|
|
5
|
|
City of Johannesburg v National Consumer Commission (NCT/2667/2011/101(1)(P), NCT/2081/2011/101(1)(P))
|
[2012] ZANCT 6
|
|
South Africa
|
30 Mar 2012
|
SAFLII
|
|
10
|
|
Sanford v Haley NO
|
2004 3 SA 296
|
|
South Africa
|
circa 2004
|
LexisNexis
|
|
37 
|
|
Uitenhage Transitional Local Council v South African Revenue Service
|
[2003] ZASCA 76; 2004 1 SA 292; [2003] 4 All SA 37; [2003] JOL 11450
|
Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa
|
South Africa
|
5 Sep 2003
|
SAFLII
|
|
161
|
|
Nedcor Investment Bank Ltd v Visser NO
|
2002 4 SA 588
|
|
South Africa
|
circa 2002
|
LexisNexis
|
|
21
|
|
“ circumstances or ‘ cause ’ must be such that a valid and justifiable reason exists why compliance did not occur and why non-compliance can be condoned &rdquo
|
2002 3 SA 87
|
|
South Africa
|
circa 2002
|
LexisNexis
|
|
9
|
|
General Accident Insurance Co South Africa Ltd v Zampelli
|
1988 4 SA 407
|
|
South Africa
|
circa 1988
|
LexisNexis
|
|
23
|
|
Du Plooy v Anwes Motors (Edms) Bpk
|
1983 4 SA 212
|
|
South Africa
|
circa 1983
|
LexisNexis
|
|
53
|
|
Mbutuma v Xhosa Development Corporation Ltd
|
1978 1 SA 681
|
|
South Africa
|
circa 1978
|
LexisNexis
|
|
44
|
|
Immelman v Loubser
|
1974 3 SA 816; [1974] 4 All SA 89
|
|
South Africa
|
circa 1974
|
LexisNexis
|
|
36
|
|
Mofokeng v Attorney General
|
2 OFS 1958
|
|
South Africa - Orange Free State
|
circa 1958
|
|
|
2
|
|
Silber v Ozen Wholesalers (Pty) Ltd
|
1954 2 SA 345
|
|
South Africa
|
circa 1954
|
LexisNexis
|
|
261
|
|
Penrice v Dickinson
|
[1945] AD 6
|
|
|
circa 1945
|
|
|
15
|
|
Executors v Gaarn
|
[1912] AD 181
|
|
|
circa 1912
|
|
|
161
|
