LawCite Search |
LawCite Markup Tool |
Help |
Feedback
Law Cite |
Case Name | Citation(s) | Court | Jurisdiction | Date † | Full Text | Citation Index | |
Bevan & Bevan |
[2013] FamCAFC 116; |
Family Court of Australia | Australia | 8 Aug 2013 | AustLII |
|
|
Family Property Law and the Three Fundamental Propositions in Stanford v Stanford |
|
Family Law Review | Canada | circa 2013 |
|
||
(2012) 247 CLR 108; (2012) 87 Aljr 74; (2012) 47 Fam LR 481; [2012] FLC 93-518; (2012) 293 ALR 70; [2012] Hca 52 |
|
High Court of Australia | Australia - Commonwealth | circa 2012 | Legal Online / Westlaw |
|
|
Rosati & Rosati |
[1998] FamCA 38; |
Family Court of Australia | Australia | 2 Apr 1998 | AustLII |
|
|
Aleksovski v Aleksovski |
[1996] FamCAFC 111; |
Family Court of Australia | Australia | 16 Oct 1996 | AustLII |
|
|
White & Tulloch & White |
|
Australia | circa 1995 | LexisNexis AU |
|
||
Burke v Burke |
|
Australia | circa 1992 | Legal Online / Westlaw |
|