LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback Law Cite

HQH Enterprises Ltd v Wangbao Trading Ltd    

Legislation Cited

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name	Citation(s)	Court	Jurisdiction	Date †	Full Text		Citation Index
Soto v Our Real Estate Ltd	[2018] PGSC 55	Supreme Court of Papua New Guinea	Papua New Guinea	31 Aug 2018	PacLII		10
Paga No 36 Ltd v Eleadona	[2018] PGSC 17	Supreme Court of Papua New Guinea	Papua New Guinea	30 May 2018	PacLII		9
Kiso v Otoa	[2013] PGSC 3	Supreme Court of Papua New Guinea	Papua New Guinea	1 Mar 2013	PacLII		7
Koitachi Ltd v Walter Schnaubelt	[2007] SC 870		United Kingdom - Scotland	circa 2007			14
Papua Club Inc v Nasaum Holdings Ltd	[2004] PGNC 178	National Court of Papua New Guinea	Papua New Guinea	3 Sep 2004	PacLII		16
Timano v Timano	[1993] PNGLR 334		Papua New Guinea	circa 1995	PacLII		4
Emas Estate v Mea	[1993] PNGLR 219		Papua New Guinea	circa 1993	PacLII		3
Mudge has been followed and applied by this court on numerous occasions: Keindip v Papua New Guinea	[1993] PNGLR 28		Papua New Guinea	circa 1993	PacLII		15
Emas Estate Development Pty Ltd v John Mea	[1993] PNGLR 215		Papua New Guinea	circa 1993	PacLII		138
SCR No 2 of 1992: Re The Leadership Code	[1992] PNGLR 332		Papua New Guinea	circa 1992	PacLII		2
Davis v Pitzz	[1988-89] PNGLR 143		Papua New Guinea	circa 1988	PacLII		11
Kekedo v Burns Philp (PNG)	[1988-89] PNGLR 122		Papua New Guinea	circa 1988	PacLII		325
Mudge v Secretary for Lands	[1985] PNGLR 387		Papua New Guinea	circa 1985	PacLII		185
Mudge v Secretary for Lands	[1985] PNGLR 37		Papua New Guinea	circa 1985	PacLII		2
Dent v Kavali	[1981] PNGLR 488		Papua New Guinea	circa 1981	PacLII		42
(1)(a) of the Land Registration Act provides is a difficult one indeed Mudge is a considered, unanimous judgment of three judges of this Court It adopts as applicable to the construction of s 33(1)(a) the understanding of that meaning adopted by a long line of authority of judgments of the highest persuasive authority Mudge and that line of overseas authority has, on many an occasion, been followed by this Court On the other hand, Emas Estate Development Pty Ltd v Mea is also a judgment of this Court constituted by three members, one of whom dissented on a matter of relevant principle as to the outcome It, too, has been followed more than once by this Court The question as to which line of authority is correct has not to date, as well it might have been, been considered, much less answered, by this Court constituted by more than three judges In hindsight, were there to be a departure from Mudge, Emas Estate Development Pty Ltd v Mea or any other of the later cases where that departure is evident ought desirably to have been heard and determined by this Court constituted by five judges: Public Prosecutor v John Aia and Peter Pino	[1978] PNGLR 224		Papua New Guinea	circa 1978	PacLII		18