|
Keller v Ashford
|
133 US 610; 33 L Ed 667; 10 SCt 494
|
United States Supreme Court
|
United States
|
3 Mar 1890
|
WorldLII
|
|
 15 
|
|
Lushington v Sewell
|
[1827] EngR 701; 57 ER 641; (1827) 1 Sim 435
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1827
|
CommonLII
|
|
2
|
|
Pybus v Smith
|
[1790] EngR 2387; 30 ER 294; (1790) 1 Ves Jr 189
|
Court of Chancery
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1790
|
CommonLII
|
|
2
|
|
Clinton v Hooper
|
[1791] EngR 1264; (1790-1791) 1 Ves Jr 173; 30 ER 286; 188 Kay 613
|
Court of Chancery
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1790
|
CommonLII
|
|
1
|
|
Townend v Toker
|
[1866] UKLawRpCh 46; (1865-1866) LR 1 LRCh App 446
|
|
United Kingdom
|
28 May 1866
|
CommonLII
|
|
|
|
Between Sir Ralph Noel, Baronet, and the Honourable Lady Judith his Wife, The Honourable Nathaniel, Curzon, and The Right Hon Robert Sewallis Shirley, Commonly Called Lord Viscount Tamworth, and the Right Honourable Suphia Caroline, Viscountess Tamworth, his Wife, Defendants in the suit in the Court of Exchequer-Appellants; and The Reverend Thomas Noel and Catherine his Wife, Vincent Hilton Biscoe and Anna Catharina his Wife, Plaintiffs in the Exchequer; Morton Lord Henley, Sir James Bland Burges, Thomas Noel, Robert Ralph Noel, Sophia Ann Noel Frances Noel, Charles Noel, Edward Henry Noel, Robert Tritton and Mary his Wife, clement Strong and Catherine Bridget his Wife, Sophia Biscoe, Robert Biscoe Harriet Susannah Biscoe, Elizabeth Biscoe Frederick Biscoe, William Archibald Biscoe, Frances Agnata Biscoe, Thomas Linwood Strong, Thomas William Blomefield, Robert Harry Inglis, John Tritton, and Robert Barclay, Defendants in the Excchequer-Respondents
|
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1823
|
CommonLII
|
|
|
