Matching Cases: 34

Case Name	Citation(s)	Court †	Jurisdiction	Date	Full Text		Citation Index
Wilson v Dryvit Sys , Inc	206 FSupp 2d 749	" and does not appear to distinguish between negligent-design claims and, say, negligent-misrepresentation claims Accordingly, North Carolina's economic-loss doctrine bars both tort claims Holden Farms seeks to assert We recognize that a contrary implication might be drawn from a recent federal case (not cited by the parties)	United States		Westlaw		1
See Seneca Nation of Indians v New York	206 FSupp 2d 448		United States		Westlaw		3
EEOC v Morgan Stanley & Co	206 FSupp 2d 559		United States		Westlaw		1
See Smith v Suprema Specialties, Inc	206 FSupp 2d 627		United States		Westlaw		1
See Campagna v Commonwealth	206 FSupp 2d 120		United States		Westlaw		1
Reilly Foam Corporation v Rubbermaid Corporation	206 FSupp 2d 643		United States		Westlaw		1
Omnipoint Holdings, Inc v Town of Westford	206 FSupp 2d 166		United States		Westlaw		2
Intervest Financial Services, Inc v SG Cowen Securities Corporation	206 FSupp 2d 702		United States		Westlaw		1
United States v Connolly	206 FSupp 2d 187		United States		Westlaw		1
Campbell v BankBoston, NA	206 FSupp 2d 70		United States		Westlaw		1
Cirino-Encarnaci ó n v Concilio de Salud Integral de Lo í za, Inc	206 FSupp 2d 251		United States		Westlaw
Kentuckians for the Commonwealth, Inc v Rivenburgh	206 FSupp 2d 782		United States		Westlaw		1
Dale v Frankel	206 FSupp 2d 315		United States		Westlaw		1
Blanchard v State Farm Lloyds	206 FSupp 2d 840		United States		Westlaw		1
SEC v Goren	206 FSupp 2d 344		United States		Westlaw		1
Robinson v Stegall	206 FSupp 2d 859		United States		Westlaw		1
Indemnity Ins Co of North America v Hanjin Shipping Co	206 FSupp 2d 927		United States		Westlaw		1
Atl Fish Spotters Ass'n v Evans	206 FSupp 2d 81		United States		Westlaw		1
United States v Pfeifer	206 FSupp 2d 1002		United States		Westlaw		3
See United States v Reid	206 FSupp 2d 132		United States		Westlaw		1
Uiîited States v. Navarro Viayra	206 FSupp 2d 1057		United States		Westlaw		1
See Goya de PR , Inc v Rowland	206 FSupp 2d 211		United States		Westlaw		1
Exxon Mobil Corporation v Norton	206 FSupp 2d 1085		United States		Westlaw		1
Pollara v Seymour ("Pollara II")	206 FSupp 2d 333		United States		Westlaw		1
Middle Rio Grande Conservancy Dist v Babbitt	206 FSupp 2d 1156		United States		Westlaw		2
Araujo v John Hancock Life Ins Co	206 FSupp 2d 377		United States		Westlaw		3
See Bland v Freightliner LLC	206 FSupp 2d 1202		United States		Westlaw		1
See Blake v Southcoast Health Sys , Inc	206 FSupp 2d 174		United States		Westlaw
Monsanto Co v Campuzano	206 FSupp 2d 1239		United States		Westlaw		1
Anderson v Miller	206 FSupp 2d 352		United States		Westlaw		1
Viraj Group, Ltd v United States	206 FSupp 2d 1340		United States		Westlaw		1
Orleans Int'l, Inc v United States	206 FSupp 2d 1318		United States		Westlaw		1
Mullane v Chambers	206 FSupp 2d 105		United States		Westlaw		1
See Outek Caribbean Distribs , Inc v Echo, Inc	206 FSupp 2d 263		United States		Westlaw		1