Matching Cases: 38

Case Name	Citation(s)	Court †	Jurisdiction	Date	Full Text		Citation Index
see In re Pfohl Brothers Landfill Litigation	68 FSupp 2d 236	Pfohl I "), but also ruling that plaintiffs should have suspected the cause of their injuries no later than the end of 1991 and that therefore, even under 42 USC § 9658, their claims, asserted beginning in 1995, were barred by the relevant statute of limitations	United States	circa 1995	Westlaw		1
Von Gunten v Maryland Dep't of Env't	68 FSupp 2d 654		United States		Westlaw		1
Bochan v La Fontaine	68 FSupp 2d 692		United States		Westlaw		2
Bayou Fleet v Alexander	68 FSupp 2d 734		United States		Westlaw		1
68 FSupp 2d 113	68 FSupp 2d 113		United States		Westlaw
See United States v Garcia	68 FSupp 2d 802		United States		Westlaw		1
United States v Rodrigues	68 FSupp 2d 178		United States		Westlaw		6
see also Dennis v Mitchell	68 FSupp 2d 863		United States		Westlaw		2
Maria v McElroy	68 FSupp 2d 206		United States		Westlaw		6
Haven v Rzeczpospolita Polska (Republic of Poland)	68 FSupp 2d 947		United States	circa 1995	Westlaw		1
accord Land Ocean Logistics, Inc v Aqua Gulf Corporation	68 FSupp 2d 263		United States	circa 1995	Westlaw		1
See, e g , Allstate Ins Co v Westinghouse Elec Corporation	68 FSupp 2d 983		United States	circa 1995	Westlaw		1
Vasquez v Greiner	68 FSupp 2d 307		United States	circa 1995	Westlaw		4
Wiora v Harrah's Illinois Corporation	68 FSupp 2d 988		United States	circa 1995	Westlaw		1
First City, Texas-Houston, NA v Rafidain Bank	68 FSupp 2d 377		United States	circa 1995	Westlaw		1
United States v Harvey	68 FSupp 2d 1001		United States	circa 1995	Westlaw		1
M Eagles Tool Warehouse, Inc v Fisher Tooling Co , Inc	68 FSupp 2d 494		United States	circa 1995	Westlaw		1
United States v Harvey	68 FSupp 2d 1010		United States	circa 1995	Westlaw		1
Smith-Berch, Inc v Baltimore County	68 FSupp 2d 602		United States	circa 1995	Westlaw		1
See Group Health Plan, Inc v Philip Morris, Inc	68 FSupp 2d 1064		United States	circa 1995	Westlaw		2
Nebraska See Entergy, Arkansas, Inc v Nebraska	68 FSupp 2d 1093		United States		Westlaw		3
Rudel Mach Co v Giddings & Lewis, Inc	68 FSupp 2d 118		United States		Westlaw		1
Entergy, Arkansas, Inc v Nebraska	68 FSupp 2d 1104		United States		Westlaw		3
McCambridge v Hall	68 FSupp 2d 1		United States		Westlaw		1
68 FSupp 2d 1108-10	68 FSupp 2d 1108-10		United States		Westlaw		1
Armco Inc v North Atlantic Ins Co , Ltd	68 FSupp 2d 330		United States		Westlaw		1
Olam v Congress Mortgage Co (ND Cal 1999)	68 FSupp 2d 1110		United States	circa 1999	Westlaw		2
Kurilla v Callahan	68 FSupp 2d 556		United States	circa 1999	Westlaw		1
Abada v Charles Schwab & Co , Inc	68 FSupp 2d 1160		United States		Westlaw		1
Williams v Astra USA, Inc	68 FSupp 2d 29		United States		Westlaw		1
Ilick v Miller	68 FSupp 2d 1169		United States		Westlaw		1
see also Lalondriz v USA Networks, Inc	68 FSupp 2d 285		United States		Westlaw		1
see also Flenker v Willamette Indus , Inc	68 FSupp 2d 1261		United States		Westlaw		1
United States v Tuitt	68 FSupp 2d 4		United States		Westlaw		2
Denney v City of Albany	68 FSupp 2d 1369		United States		Westlaw		1
Defendants Potter v City of Albany	68 FSupp 2d 1360		United States		Westlaw		1
See, e g , Evans v Artuz	68 FSupp 2d 188		United States		Westlaw		1
See St Albans Coop Creamery, Inc v Glickman	68 FSupp 2d 380		United States		Westlaw		1