Matching Cases: 48

Case Name	Citation(s)	Court	Jurisdiction	Date	Full Text		Citation Index †
Nazir Ahmad v King Emperor	AIR 1936 PC 253	Privy Council	India	circa 1936			104
Rangoon	AIR 1936 PC 230	Privy Council	India	circa 1936			19
Andre Paul Terence Ambard Vs The Attorney General for Trinidad and Tabago	AIR 1936 PC 141	Privy Council	India	circa 1936			16
Stephen Seneviratne v R	AIR 1936 PC 289	Privy Council	India	circa 1936			15
Attygalle v Emperor	AIR 1936 PC 169	Privy Council	India	circa 1936			11
Hem Singh v Basant Das	AIR 1936 PC 93	Privy Council	India	circa 1936			7
Bhojraj v Sita Ram	AIR 1936 PC 60	Privy Council	India	circa 1936			7
Tyagaraja Mudaliyar v Vedathanni	AIR 1936 PC 70	Privy Council	India	circa 1936			6
Mahadeo v R	AIR 1936 PC 242	Privy Council	India	circa 1936			5
Geogre , Friar Grahame v Attorney General, Fiji	AIR 1936 PC 224	Privy Council	India	circa 1936			4
Air 1936 PC 246	AIR 1936 PC 246	Privy Council	India	circa 1936			4
Air 1936 PC 49	AIR 1936 PC 49	Privy Council	India	circa 1936			3
Air 1936 PC 277	AIR 1936 PC 277	Privy Council	India	circa 1936			3
Air 1936 PC 204	AIR 1936 PC 204	Privy Council	India	circa 1936			3
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs Currimbhoy Ebrahim and Sons	AIR 1936 PC 1	Privy Council	India	circa 1936			2
Ahmedabad v Moti Lal Hirabhai Spinning and Manufacturing Co Ltd Ahmedabad	AIR 1936 PC 77	Privy Council	India	circa 1936			2
Ballabh Das v Nur Mohammad	AIR 1936 PC 83	Privy Council	India	circa 1936			2
Air 1936 PC 171	AIR 1936 PC 171	Privy Council	India	circa 1936			2
Air 1936 PC 63	AIR 1936 PC 63	Privy Council	India	circa 1936			2
Air 1936 PC 193	AIR 1936 PC 193	Privy Council	India	circa 1936			2
Air 1936 PC 258	AIR 1936 PC 258	Privy Council	India	circa 1936			2
Air 1936 PC 264	AIR 1936 PC 264	Privy Council	India	circa 1936			2
Poornandachi v Gopalasami	AIR 1936 PC 281	Privy Council	India	circa 1936			2
Air 1936 PC 285	AIR 1936 PC 285	Privy Council	India	circa 1936			2
Air 1936 PC 301	AIR 1936 PC 301	Privy Council	India	circa 1936			2
Air 1936 PC 318	AIR 1936 PC 318	Privy Council	India	circa 1936			2
Air 1936 PC 1936	AIR 1936 PC 1936	Privy Council	India	circa 1936			2
Air 1936 PC 252	AIR 1936 PC 252	Privy Council	India	circa 1936			1
Air 1936 PC 27	AIR 1936 PC 27	Privy Council	India	circa 1936			1
Nazi Ahmed v Emperor	AIR 1936 PC 256	Privy Council	India	circa 1936			1
Air 1936 PC 3187	AIR 1936 PC 3187	Privy Council	India	circa 1936			1
Air 1936 PC 332	AIR 1936 PC 332	Privy Council	India	circa 1936			1
Effuah Amissah v Effuah Krabah	AIR 1936 PC 147	Privy Council	India	circa 1936			1
Air 1936 PC 91	AIR 1936 PC 91	Privy Council	India	circa 1936			1
Bhojraj v Sita Ram	AIR 1936 PC 66	Privy Council	India	circa 1936			1
Air 1936 PC 55	AIR 1936 PC 55	Privy Council	India	circa 1936			1
Air 1936 PC 34	AIR 1936 PC 34	Privy Council	India	circa 1936			1
Frederick Emmanuel Abeyesundera v Ceylon Exports Ltd	AIR 1936 PC 259	Privy Council	India	circa 1936			1
Krishna Roy v Mirza Mahammad Syed Ali Mutawali	AIR 1936 PC 15	Privy Council	India	circa 1936			1
Air 1936 PC 833	AIR 1936 PC 833	Privy Council	India	circa 1936			1
Mt Binda Kuer v Lalita Prasad	AIR 1936 PC 304	Privy Council	India	circa 1936			1
Verwaltung Gimb H v Indian Oil Corporation Ltd) and	AIR 1936 PC 760	Privy Council	India	circa 1936
Air 1936 PC 24210	AIR 1936 PC 24210	Privy Council	India	circa 1936
N "No second appeal lies on the ground of an erroneous finding of In the first place objection is taken to the fact.'* finding of Bo»e J that the findings of the (b) C P Tenancy Act (1920), S 2 (5) (d) -- Courts below that these buildings were not Agricultural holding--Building constructed -- Prima facie there is diversion -- Tenant must erected for the convenient or profitable use prove contrary or occupation of the holding (vide the Prfma facie the erection of a building on land words of s. 2 (5) (d), C P Tenancy Act), which is let for agricultural purposes, that is to and were not consistent with the pur say, for the purpose of being cultivated and for no other purpose, is a diversion for non-agricultural pose for which it was let are findings of fact uses; and once the fapt of the erection of a sub which cannot be raised in second appeal, stantial building is established it is for the tenant and reliance has been placed on the Privy to show that it has been built in circumstances Council decision in		Privy Council	India	circa 1936
Air 1936 PC 183	AIR 1936 PC 183	Privy Council	India	circa 1936
Nazir Ahmed v King Emperor	AIR 1936 PC 243	Privy Council	India	circa 1936
Air 1936 PC 1834	AIR 1936 PC 1834	Privy Council	India	circa 1936
Air 1936 PC 8	AIR 1936 PC 8	Privy Council	India	circa 1936