ous controversies For the purposes of this revi S 35, the onus is on him to establish that inde sion, we are concerned with only one of them, pendently of bankruptcy law ne has satisfied his namely whether two of the scheduled creditors, debts in their entirety It follows that the cre Mt Sukhdei an Din Da^al, who held money ditors could claim only such rights which they decrees were or were not entitled to be paid possessed by virtue of their decrees It is difficult interest from the date of adjudication up to the to hold that the insolvency law could be availed time of satisfaction of their debts Mt Sukhdei's of by the creditors for getting more from the decree carried future interest, I am informed, at insolvent than they could get in the absgace of 3i per cent No future interest was awarded in adjudication There is no case directly in point Din Dayal's 3ecree It would seem that the The remarks of Rankin J in 1

47 Cal 9141

California Reports

India - Tamil Nadu

Cases Referring to this Case

LawCite: Privacy | Disclaimers | Conditions of Use | Acknowledgements | Feedback