LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback Law Cite

Husain Khan v. Amiruddih. ' · 288 Oudh Municipal Board, Rae Bareli v. Suraj Bali A. I. & one of the aspects of the transaction the (a) U. P. General Clauses Act (1 [I] of 1904), S. 23 (5) -- Rae Bareli Municipal Board -- applicant has to establish that he was an Projection Bye-law No. 12 published in agriculturist at the date of the transaction Gazette--Bye-law must be held to be duly it is immaterial that the law does not insist made. . on proof of that fact so far as the second In view of S. 23 (5), U. P. General Clauses Act, aspect of the transaction is concerned. In and the fact that the bye-law No. 12 of Rae Bareli Municipal Board was published along with     3

Cases Referring to this Case

Case Name	Citation(s)	Court	Jurisdiction	Date †	Full Text		Citation Index
Municipal Board, Rae Bareli v B Suraj Bali	[1946] AllINRprOudh 31; [1946] AIR Oudh 238	All India Reporter - Oudh	India - Uttar Pradesh	2 Apr 1946	AsianLII
B Gokul Chand v Banarsi Lal	[1946] AllINRprOudh 20; [1946] AIR Oudh 236	All India Reporter - Oudh	India - Uttar Pradesh	27 Feb 1946	AsianLII
Salik Ram v Ram Sarup	[1945] AllINRprOudh 42; [1945] AIR Oudh 251	All India Reporter - Oudh	India - Uttar Pradesh	23 Apr 1945	AsianLII