LawCite Search |
LawCite Markup Tool |
Help |
Feedback
Law Cite |
Case Name | Citation(s) | Court † | Jurisdiction | Date | Full Text | Citation Index | |
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co v FH Faulding & Co Ltd |
[2000] FCA 316; |
Federal Court of Australia | Australia - Commonwealth | 22 Mar 2000 | AustLII |
|
|
Calidad Pty Ltd v Seiko Epson Corporation |
[2020] HCA 41; |
High Court of Australia | Australia - Commonwealth | 12 Nov 2020 | AustLII |
|
Journal Article Title | Citation(s) | Author † | Jurisdiction | Date | Full Text | Citation Index | |
"Patents as Administrative Acts: Patent Decisions for Administrative Review?" | [2008] UMelbLRS 13 | Dent, C | Australia | circa 2008 | AustLII |
|
|
"The Possibilities of a Regulatory Approach to Answer the Question: Should Genetic Inventions be Patentable?" | [2012] JlLawInfoSci 19 | Dent, Chris | Australia | circa 2012 | AustLII |
|
|
""Generally Inconvenient": The 1624 Statute of Monopolies as Political Compromise" | [2009] UMelbLRS 24 | Dent, Chris | Australia | circa 2009 | AustLII |
|
|
"Generally Inconvenient: The 1624 Statute of Monopolies as Political Compromise" | (2009) 33 Melbourne University Law Review 415 | Dent, Chris | Australia | circa 2009 | AustLII |
|
|
"Storyline Patents: Are Plots Patentable" | (2009) 33 Melbourne University Law Review 292 | McEniery, Ben | Australia | circa 2009 | AustLII |
|