Boulcott v Boulcott
|
[1853] EngR 1010; 2 Drew 25; 61 ER 627; 23 LJCh 57; 2 Eq Rep 457
|
Court of Chancery
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1853
|
CommonLII
|
|
7
|
Mackinnon v Sewell
|
[1833] EngR 921; 2 My & K 202; 39 ER 921
|
Court of Chancery
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1833
|
CommonLII
|
|
4
|
81 Ok 109
|
81 OK 109
|
Oklahama Supreme Court
|
United States - Oklahama
|
|
|
|
1
|
Hamersley v Newton
|
[2005] WASC 221; (2005) 30 WAR 568
|
Supreme Court of Western Australia
|
Australia - Western Australia
|
7 Oct 2005
|
AustLII
|
|
20
|
Doo v Brabant
|
[1792] EngR 695
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1792
|
CommonLII
|
|
2
|
4 HL 40
|
4 HL 40
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 2005
|
|
|
3
|
Maddison and Wife v Chapman
|
[1858] EngR 962; 70 ER 294; (1858) 4 K & J 709
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1858
|
CommonLII
|
|
8
|
Fox v Fox (No 2)
|
[1875] UKLawRpEq 16; 19 Eq 286
|
|
United Kingdom
|
1 Feb 1875
|
CommonLII
|
|
26
|
Michael Pakenham Edgeworth v Antonio Erroles Edgeworth
|
[1869] UKLawRpHL 3; (1869) LR 4 HL 35
|
|
United Kingdom
|
9 Mar 1869
|
CommonLII
|
|
6
|
21 WR 671
|
21 WR 671
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
2
|
Key v Key
|
4 DM & G 73
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
47 LT 40
|
47 LT 40
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
2
|