LawCite Search |
LawCite Markup Tool |
Help |
Feedback
Law Cite |
Case Name | Citation(s) | Court † | Jurisdiction | Date | Full Text | Citation Index | |
Moore v Dimond |
[1929] HCA 43; |
High Court of Australia | Australia - Commonwealth | 12 Dec 1929 | AustLII |
|
|
Partridge v McIntosh & Sons Ltd |
[1932] NSWStRp 78; |
Supreme Court of New South Wales | Australia - New South Wales | 25 Nov 1932 | AustLII |
|
Case Name | Citation(s) | Court † | Jurisdiction | Date | Full Text | Citation Index | |
8 Equitable Lawyer 8 |
|
Equitable Lawyer | United Kingdom |
|
|||
Moore v Dimond |
[1929] HCA 43; |
High Court of Australia | Australia - Commonwealth | 12 Dec 1929 | AustLII |
|
|
Dusk v B2statw |
|
Kings Bench | United Kingdom | circa 1929 |
|
||
Kearsley v Philips |
|
Queen's Bench | United Kingdom | circa 1883 | LexisNexis / Westlaw |
|
|
Partridge v McIntosh & Sons Ltd |
[1932] NSWStRp 78; |
Supreme Court of New South Wales | Australia - New South Wales | 25 Nov 1932 | AustLII |
|
|
7 Jur NS 411 |
|
UK | circa 1932 |
|
|||
Statute of Frauds 1677 |
|
Australia - Commonwealth | circa 1932 |
|