LawCite Search |
LawCite Markup Tool |
Help |
Feedback
Law Cite |
Case Name | Citation(s) | Court † | Jurisdiction | Date | Full Text | Citation Index | |
Meyers v Hennell |
[1912] UKLawRpCh 67; |
Court of Chancery | United Kingdom | 10 May 1912 | CommonLII |
|
|
Batten v Gedye |
[1889] UKLawRpCh 72; |
Court of Chancery | United Kingdom | 13 Apr 1889 | CommonLII |
|
|
R on the Prosecution of Samuel Vine v the Bishop of Salisbury |
[1901] UKLawRpKQB 88; |
United Kingdom | 6 May 1901 | CommonLII |
|
||
Sushil Kumar Agarwal v Kalidas Sadhu - CFA | [2009] INWBKOHCA 82 | India | 18 Feb 2009 | LIIofIndia |
|
Case Name | Citation(s) | Court † | Jurisdiction | Date | Full Text | Citation Index | |
3 QB 629 |
|
United Kingdom | LexisNexis / Westlaw |
|
|||
7 QB 406 |
|
United Kingdom | LexisNexis / Westlaw |
|
|||
R on the Prosecution of Samuel Vine v the Bishop of Salisbury |
[1901] UKLawRpKQB 88; |
United Kingdom | 6 May 1901 | CommonLII |
|
||
Sushil Kumar Agarwal v Kalidas Sadhu - CFA | [2009] INWBKOHCA 82 | India | 18 Feb 2009 | LIIofIndia |
|
||
20 Eq 6c6 |
|
United Kingdom | circa 2009 |
|
|||
5 Rep 66 |
|
Australia |
|