|
Goindama v Chand
|
[2022] FJHC 793
|
High Court of Fiji
|
Fiji
|
19 Aug 2022
|
PacLII
|
|
|
|
Ezekiel-Hart v Council of the Law Society of the ACT
|
[2021] ACTSC 133
|
Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory
|
Australia - Australian Capital Territory
|
30 Jun 2021
|
AustLII
|
|
11 
|
|
Koo Ming Kown v the Baptist Convention of Hong Kong Operating As Pui Ching Primary School
|
[2017] HKCFI 1917
|
Hong Kong Court of First Instance
|
Hong Kong
|
30 Oct 2017
|
HKLII
|
|
|
|
[2017] Hkcfi 1401 (30 October 2017)
|
[2017] HKCFI 1401
|
Hong Kong Court of First Instance
|
Hong Kong
|
30 Oct 2017
|
HKLII
|
|
|
|
Lam See Yan v Sze Ching Lok
|
[2016] HKDC 1385
|
Hong Kong District Court
|
Hong Kong
|
10 Nov 2016
|
HKLII
|
|
|
|
[2016] HKDC 736 (10 November 2016)
|
[2016] HKDC 736
|
Hong Kong District Court
|
Hong Kong
|
10 Nov 2016
|
HKLII
|
|
|
|
Hksar v Frank Laurent
|
[2015] HKCFI 951
|
Hong Kong Court of First Instance
|
Hong Kong
|
3 Aug 2015
|
HKLII
|
|
|
|
Siemer v Auckland High Court
|
[2013] NZHC 3540
|
High Court of New Zealand
|
New Zealand
|
20 Dec 2013
|
NZLII
|
|
5
|
|
Karam v Palmone Shoes Pty Ltd
|
[2012] VSCA 97
|
Supreme Court of Victoria - Court of Appeal
|
Australia - Victoria
|
15 May 2012
|
AustLII
|
|
53
|
|
Goldberg v Morrow
|
[2003] VSCA 127
|
Supreme Court of Victoria - Court of Appeal
|
Australia - Victoria
|
22 Aug 2003
|
AustLII
|
|
5
|
|
[2002] HKCFI 990 (19 September 2002)
|
[2002] HKCFI 990
|
Hong Kong Court of First Instance
|
Hong Kong
|
19 Sep 2002
|
HKLII
|
|
|
|
[2000] Hkcfi 45 (13 January 2000)
|
[2000] HKCFI 45
|
Hong Kong Court of First Instance
|
Hong Kong
|
13 Jan 2000
|
HKLII
|
|
|
|
Dibeek Holdings Pty Ltd v Notaras
|
[1998] ACTSC 9; (1998) 143 FLR 132
|
Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory
|
Australia - Australian Capital Territory
|
26 Feb 1998
|
AustLII
|
|
10
|
|
Reef Pacific (Sydney) Pty Ltd v Reef Pacific Trading Ltd
|
[1992] SBHC 8
|
High Court of Solomon Islands
|
Solomon Islands
|
23 Apr 1992
|
PacLII
|
|
|
|
IN THE MATTER of Section 11A City Area Leases Act 1936 AND IN THE MATTER of an application by CALARDU PTY Ltd to vary the provisions of R Lease of Block 18 Section 18 Division of Fyshwick in the Australian Capital Territory SC No 670 of 1989
|
[1991] ACTSC 168
|
Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory
|
Australia - Australian Capital Territory
|
19 Mar 1991
|
AustLII
|
|
|
|
IN THE MATTER of Section 11A City Area Leases Act 1936 AND IN THE MATTER of an application by CALARDU PTY Ltd to vary the provisions of R Lease of Block 18 Section 18 Division of Fyshwick in the Australian Capital Territory SC No 670 of 1989
|
[1991] ACTSC 146
|
Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory
|
Australia - Australian Capital Territory
|
19 Mar 1991
|
AustLII
|
|
|
|
Re An Application By Calardu Pty Ltd To Vary the Provisions of R Lease of Block
|
[1991] ACTSC 118
|
Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory
|
Australia - Australian Capital Territory
|
19 Mar 1991
|
AustLII
|
|
|
|
Wiedenhofer v The Commonwealth
|
[1970] HCA 54; (1970) 122 CLR 172; 45 ALJR 48
|
High Court of Australia
|
Australia - Commonwealth
|
9 Dec 1970
|
AustLII
|
|
19
|
|
Tirumalanadham Surayya v Tirumalandham Bapirazu
|
[1915] AllINRprMad 154; (1916) 1 MWN 121; 18 MLT 459; [1916] AIR Mad 486
|
All India Reporter - Madras
|
India - Tamil Nadu
|
1 Oct 1915
|
AsianLII
|
|
|
|
T R M a R R M Arunachalam Chetty v K N Kothandapani Pillai
|
[1914] AllINRprMad 155; (1915) 38 Mad 479
|
All India Reporter - Madras
|
India
|
2 Dec 1914
|
AsianLII
|
|
|
