LawCite Search |
LawCite Markup Tool |
Help |
Feedback
Law Cite |
Case Name | Citation(s) † | Court | Jurisdiction | Date | Full Text | Citation Index | |
Calidad Pty Ltd v Seiko Epson Corporation | [2020] HCATrans 106 | High Court of Australia | Australia - Commonwealth | 11 Aug 2020 | AustLII |
|
|
Calidad Pty Ltd v Seiko Epson Corporation |
[2020] HCA 41; |
High Court of Australia | Australia - Commonwealth | 12 Nov 2020 | AustLII |
|
|
Calidad Pty Ltd v Seiko Epson Corporation |
[2019] FCAFC 115; |
Federal Court of Australia | Australia - Commonwealth | 5 Jul 2019 | AustLII |
|
|
Seiko Epson Corporation v Calidad Pty Ltd |
[2017] FCA 1403; |
Federal Court of Australia | Australia - Commonwealth | 29 Nov 2017 | AustLII |
|
|
Austshade Pty Ltd v Boss Shade Pty Ltd |
[2016] FCA 287; |
Federal Court of Australia | Australia - Commonwealth | 23 Mar 2016 | AustLII |
|
|
QS Holdings Sarl v Paul ’ s Retail Pty Ltd |
[2011] FCA 853; |
Federal Court of Australia | Australia - Commonwealth | 2 Aug 2011 | AustLII |
|
|
Government Insurance Office (NSW) v KA Reed Services Pty Ltd |
[1988] VicRp 75; |
Australia - Victoria | 30 Nov 1987 | AustLII |
|
||
Re Festival Records Pty Ltd v International Direct Marketing Pty Ltd | [1985] FCA 446 | Federal Court of Australia | Australia - Commonwealth | 28 Nov 1985 | AustLII |
|
|
Interstate Parcel Express Co Pty Ltd v Time-Life International (Nederlands) BV |
[1977] HCA 52; |
High Court of Australia | Australia - Commonwealth | 29 Sep 1977 | AustLII |
|
|
Columbia Gramophone Coy Ltd v Fossey |
[1927] NSWStRp 25; |
Supreme Court of New South Wales | Australia - New South Wales | 13 May 1927 | AustLII |
|
|
has changed | [1911] HCA 1 | High Court of Australia | Australia - Commonwealth | circa 1911 | AustLII |
|
Journal Article Title | Citation(s) † | Author | Jurisdiction | Date | Full Text | Citation Index | |
"The prior use defence and exhaustion doctrine in intellectual property law" (FCA) | [2021] FedJSchol 3 | Rares, Justice Steven | Australia | circa 2021 | AustLII |
|
|
"Limitations on the Scope of a Patentee's Exclusive Rights in the Context of Third Party Experimental Uses" | (2006) 29 University of New South Wales Law Journal 63 | Monotti, Dr Ann | Australia | circa 2006 | AustLII |
|
Legislation Name | Provision |
Patents Act 1903 (Cth) |
Case Name | Citation(s) † | Court | Jurisdiction | Date | Full Text | Citation Index | |
McGruther v Pitcher |
[1904] UKLawRpCh 114; |
United Kingdom | 8 Jul 1904 | CommonLII |
|
||
Taddy & Co v Sterious & Co |
[1903] UKLawRpCh 173; |
Court of Chancery | United Kingdom | 11 Dec 1903 | CommonLII |
|
|
British Mutoscope and Biograph Co v Homer |
[1901] UKLawRpCh 18; |
Court of Chancery | United Kingdom | 24 Jan 1901 | CommonLII |
|
|
Brogden |
|
circa 1899 |
|
||||
Cantelo |
|
circa 1895 |
|
||||
Heap v Hartley |
|
circa 1888 |
|
||||
Societe Anonyme Des Manufactures De Glaces v Tilghman's Patent Sand Blast Co |
[1883] UKLawRpCh 218; |
Court of Chancery | United Kingdom | 3 Nov 1883 | CommonLII |
|
|
7 CLR 481 |
|
Australia - Commonwealth | Legal Online / Westlaw |
|
|||
LR 6 Ch 239 |
|
Court of Chancery | United Kingdom | LexisNexis / Westlaw |
|