|
KS R ' ecommendation accepted For the appellants it is argued that limitation is to be reckoned up to A I R 1934 Rangoon 117 the date on which the memorandum Mya Bu and Dunkley, JJ of appeal is presented, whether leave M R M Ramasawmy -- to appeal has been obtained at that Appellants time or not, and that leave can be Y granted after the period of limitation has expired In support of this pro Power --Respondents position the cases of Anmithanarayana Civil Misc Appeal No 58 of 1933, Ayyar v Sankaranarayana Ayyar (1) Decided on 16th February 1934, against and W Elliot v Subbiah (2), are order of Dist Judge, Tharrawaddy, D/ quoted These cases are
|
|
|
India - Tamil Nadu
|
circa 1924
|
|
|
 2
|
