|
A judge will be criticised as having abandoned impartiality and independence, and of having descended into the arena, if he or she takes a point favouring one party s case which that party has not raised: see Villiers v Villiers  
|
[2022] EWCA Civ 772
|
England and Wales Court of Appeal - Civil Division
|
United Kingdom - England and Wales
|
10 Jun 2022
|
BAILII
|
|
 2
|
|
Ainslie v Ainslie
|
[1927] ArgusLawRp 43; (1927) 33 ALR 301
|
Argus Law Reports
|
Australia
|
30 May 1927
|
AustLII
|
|
|
|
Ainslie v Ainslie
|
[1927] HCA 23; (1927) 39 CLR 381; [1927] ALR 301
|
High Court of Australia
|
Australia - Commonwealth
|
30 May 1927
|
AustLII
|
|
42 
|
|
Booth v Booth (No 2)
|
[1935] ArgusLawRp 39; (1935) 41 ALR 235
|
Argus Law Reports
|
Australia
|
13 May 1935
|
AustLII
|
|
|
|
Chiman Lal v Pan Bai –
|
(1978) 24 FLR 121
|
|
Australia
|
23 Nov 1978
|
PacLII
|
|
1
|
|
Gillam v Gillam
|
[1943] TASStRp 2; [1943] Tas SR 1
|
|
Australia - Tasmania
|
31 Mar 1943
|
AustLII
|
|
|
|
Morris v Morris
|
[1958] VicRp 28; [1958] VR 147; [1958] ALR 446
|
|
Australia - Victoria
|
29 Mar 1957
|
AustLII
|
|
10
|
|
Ploog v Ploog
|
[1946] ArgusLawRp 69; (1947) 53 ALR 140
|
Argus Law Reports
|
Australia
|
11 Sep 1946
|
AustLII
|
|
|
|
Riley v Rule
|
26 Tas LR 31
|
|
Australia - Tasmania
|
27 Mar 1931
|
AustLII
|
|
|
|
Villiers v Villiers
|
[2021] EWFC 23
|
England and Wales Family Court
|
United Kingdom - England and Wales
|
11 Mar 2021
|
BAILII
|
|
4
|
