LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback

Law
Cite


Cases Referring to this Case | Law Reform Reports Referring to this Case | Law Journal Articles Referring to this Case | Legislation Cited | Cases and Articles Cited

Help

(Kamarsu) Ramachandra Rao v (Simhadri) Rattayya   flag 

[1933] AllINRprMad 69; [1934] AIR Mad 198
All India Reporter - Madras
India - Tamil Nadu
12th October, 1933

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name Citation(s) Court Jurisdiction †  Date Full Text Citation Index
2 P 202; 201 CS 1 2 P 202; 201 CS 1 Canada - Quebec flag 13
[1930] Mad 20 [1930] Mad 20 India circa 1930 flag 2
Air 1926 Mad 187 AIR 1926 Mad 187 India - Tamil Nadu circa 1926 flag 4
Air 1919 All 252--51 AIR 1919 All 252--51 India - Uttar Pradesh circa 1919 flag 2
(1928) 108 IC 897 (1928) 108 IC 897 United Kingdom circa 1928 flag 2
Matthey v Curling [1922] 2 AC 180; 91 LJKB 593 United Kingdom circa 1922 LexisNexis / Westlaw flag 34
Jackson, J T Balakrishna Iyer--Plaintiff--Op ' Kovummal Animal--Plaintiff--Appel posite Party lant- Civil Revn Petn No 998 of 1933, Second Appeal No 603 of 1933, De Decided on 11th October 1933, from cided on 28th November 1933, from order of City Civil Judge, Madras, D/ decree of Dist Judge, North Malabar, in 3rd August 1923 * A S No 469 of 1932 (a) Civil P C (1908), S 151 -- Court can Civil P C (1908), O 17, Rr 2 and 3 - not go beyond prescribed remedy by using Vakil pleading no instructions and party not inherent power prepared to go on--R 2 applies Where there is a prescribed remedy the Court Rules 2 and 3, 0 17, are mutually exclusive, cannot go beyond this remedy by using its in and where the vakil pleads no instructions and herent powers under S- 151 TP 200 C 1,2] thie party is not prepared to go on, R 2 applies: (b) Civil PC (1908), O 39, R 1 (b) and (1928) 108 IC 897 United Kingdom circa 1908 flag 2
2 P 200 2 P 200 circa 1908 15
1 P 201 1 P 201 circa 1908 2

LawCite: Privacy | Disclaimers | Conditions of Use | Acknowledgements | Feedback