LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback Law Cite

Bobba Varalakshmamma v Kosaraju Jannayya    

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name	Citation(s)	Court †	Jurisdiction	Date	Full Text		Citation Index
[1933] Australian Law Journal 1488	[1933] Australian Law Journal 1488	Australian Law Journal	Australia	circa 1933	Legal Online		1
59 Mad 3421	59 Mad 3421		India				1
(1941) 2 MLJ 655	(1941) 2 MLJ 655		Malaysia	circa 1941	LexisNexis		2
159 IC 228	159 IC 228		United Kingdom				1
[1939] Lah 210	[1939] Lah 210		Pakistan	circa 1939			2
201 IC 195	201 IC 195		United Kingdom				2
[1941-2] MLJ 655	[1941-2] MLJ 655		Malaysia	circa 1941	LexisNexis		3
41 PLB 568	41 PLB 568		United Kingdom				2
[1942] Mad 78	[1942] Mad 78		India	circa 1942			2
11 Mad 3562	11 Mad 3562		India				1
[1985] Mad 893	[1985] Mad 893		India	circa 1985			1
319/ P 320	319/ P 320						2
Note "First, where . . · · ^ deposited within aforesaid time. purchaser.'* Where the decree-holder auction purchaser who P. Sivaramakrishnayya -- for Appellant. has obtained permission to set off deposits the dif ference between the amount for which he purchased A. Lakshmayya and N. F. B. Sankar Bao -- for Respondent. the property and the amount due to him under the decree, within 15 days from the date of the sale the Judgment.--These arise of an application provisions of O. 21, R. 85 are complied with. It is to execute the decree in O. S. No. 53 of 1935 not necessary for the decree-holder auction purchaser to pay within 15 days from the date of sale that on the file of the District Munsif's Court of portion of the amount that may be payable rateably Masulipatam. It was a simple money decree. to the other creditors who may claim a share in the The properties of the judgment-debtor were assets realised by the sale. Therefore, the non-pay attached and sold in a court sale held on 2nd ment by the decree-holder purchaser of the money payable to the creditor entitled to rateable distribu July 1936. The decree-holder had obtained tion within 15 days from the date of the sale does permission to bid and set off and his bid for not justify the setting aside of the sale : ('35) 22 Rs. 1562 was accepted. The amount shown			India - Tamil Nadu	circa 1935			2
Mangat Bai v Duli- Z (*88)	11 Mad 356		India	circa 1935			4
59 Mad 342	59 Mad 342		India	circa 1935			1
186 IC 152	186 IC 152		United Kingdom	circa 1935			2