LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback Law Cite

Imtiaz Ali Khan v Sheikh Badruddin    

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name	Citation(s)	Court	Jurisdiction	Date	Full Text †		Citation Index
[1940] Australian Law Journal 439	[1940] Australian Law Journal 439	Australian Law Journal	Australia	circa 1940	Legal Online		2
65 CLJ 403	65 CLJ 403						2
68 Cal 1214	68 Cal 1214		United States - California				2
9 CLJ 291	9 CLJ 291						2
13 CWN 552	13 CWN 552		India				2
Air 1917 Oudh 362	AIR 1917 Oudh 362		India - Uttar Pradesh	circa 1917			2
176 IC 212	176 IC 212		United Kingdom				3
Air 1919 All 3111	AIR 1919 All 3111		India - Uttar Pradesh	circa 1919			1
23 Mad 151	23 Mad 151		India				6
Air 1931 Cal 341	AIR 1931 Cal 341		India - West Bengal	circa 1931			3
4 IC 573	4 IC 573		United Kingdom				2
Air 1931 Cal 3411	AIR 1931 Cal 3411		India - West Bengal	circa 1931			2
Air 1939 PC 80	AIR 1939 PC 80	Privy Council	India	circa 1939			6
411k P 412	411k P 412						2
Air 1940 All 423	AIR 1940 All 423		India - Uttar Pradesh	circa 1940			3
11 Own 1103	11 OWN 1103		Canada - Ontario				3
[1938] Cal 25	[1938] Cal 25		United States - California	circa 1938			3
151 IC 541	151 IC 541		United Kingdom				2
[1939] Own 313	[1939] OWN 313		Canada - Ontario	circa 1939			2
35 CWN 490	35 CWN 490		India				2
[1939] Own 3131	[1939] OWN 3131		Canada - Ontario	circa 1939			2
401 Cr LJ 667	401 Cr LJ 667		India				2
(1937) LR 2 Cal 373	(1937) LR 2 Cal 373		United States - California	circa 1937			3
11 Own 11031	11 OWN 11031		Canada - Ontario				2
[1943] Own 299	[1943] OWN 299		Canada - Ontario	circa 1943			1
40 IC 742	40 IC 742		United Kingdom				3
Veluthandi Beerankutty v Ameth Mammu	[1939] PC 80; 180 IC 378		United Kingdom	circa 1939			6
Note "Amendment tion of the parties' liberty of contract with period ** reference to their rights and obligations (b) Provincial Small Cause Courts Act (1887), under the decree and that if they do contract S 25--Erroneous decision--Interference under section 25 upon terms which have reference to and An erroneous decision on a question of law consti affect the execution, discharge or satisfaction tutes no ground for interference under the exceptional of the decree, the provisions of s 47 involve powers conferred under S 25 unless substantial in that questions relating to such terms may justice has resulted [P 413c] fall to be determined by the executing Court Bam Nath -- for Applicant Following this view, it was held by the S N Srivastava -- for Opposite Party Allahabad High Court in A I R 1940 ALL, Order -- This is a judgment-debtor's 4233 4that the period of 12 years provided application in revision under s 25, Provin in s 48 should be computed from the date ce cial Small Cause Courts Act, from an order of the default mentioned in a compromise ^ passed by the Judge, Small Cause Court, decree which altered the original decree A dismissing his objection The objection was similar view was taken in A i r 1938 Gal made in the execution proceedings The ori 25,4 where an order of the Court embodying ginal decree was passed on 29th July 1924 the compromise passed subsequent to the Upon an application presented by the judg original decree was regarded in the nature ment-debtor it was amended on 23rd Novem 1 ('34) 21			India - Uttar Pradesh	circa 1934			2
44 Cr LJ 789; 208 IC 472	44 Cr LJ 789; 208 IC 472		India	circa 1934			1
191 IC 616	191 IC 616		United Kingdom	circa 1934			3