LawCite Search |
LawCite Markup Tool |
Help |
Feedback
Law Cite |
Case Name | Citation(s) | Court | Jurisdiction | Date | Full Text † | Citation Index | |
British Sugar Manufacturers Ltd v Harris |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1938 | LexisNexis / Westlaw |
|
||
2 P 196 |
|
circa 1938 |
|
||||
Air 1940 Pat 01246 |
|
India - Bihar | circa 1940 |
|
|||
Air 1945 Mad 329 |
|
India - Tamil Nadu | circa 1945 |
|
|||
160 IC 862 |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1938 |
|
|||
[1934] Itr 236 |
|
circa 1934 |
|
||||
2 Cal 215 |
|
United States - California | circa 1938 |
|
|||
[1934] Itr 2362 |
|
circa 1934 |
|
||||
2 P 195 |
|
|
|||||
[1945] Nag 197 |
|
India - Maharashtra | circa 1945 |
|
|||
16 IC 465 |
|
United Kingdom |
|
||||
107 LJKB 472 |
|
King's Bench | United Kingdom |
|
|||
2 P 19 |
|
|
|||||
Mahairam Kamjidas's(1)case ','makes the machinery workable, utres valeat potius quam pereat" We, therefore, think that we should read sub-sec (6), according to the provision of which interest has to be calculated as provided in sub-sec (8) in a manner which makes it workable and thereby prevent the clear intention of sub-sec (8) being defeated Now, how is that best done? As we have (1) |
|
Privy Council | India | circa 1940 |
|
||
Harris |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1937 |
|
|||
159 LT 365 |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1940 |
|
|||
189 IC 154 |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1940 |
|