LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback

Law
Cite


Cases Referring to this Case | Law Reform Reports Referring to this Case | Law Journal Articles Referring to this Case | Legislation Cited | Cases and Articles Cited

Help

SMT Indermani Jatia v Commissioner of Income-Tax, Up , Lucknow   flag 

[1958] INSC 90; 1959 1 SCR Supl 45; AIR 1959 SC 82
Supreme Court of India
India
3rd October, 1958

Legislation Cited

Legislation Name Provision
Finance Act s10

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name Citation(s) Court Jurisdiction Date Full Text †  Citation Index
Sharkey v Wernher [1956] AC 58; 36 Tax Cas 275 United Kingdom circa 1956 LexisNexis / Westlaw flag 38
(1924) 2 KB 432 (1924) 2 KB 432 United Kingdom circa 1924 LexisNexis / Westlaw flag 1
[1902] AC 287 [1902] AC 287 United Kingdom circa 1902 LexisNexis / Westlaw flag 23
New York Life Insurance Co v Styles (1889) 14 AC 381 United Kingdom circa 1889 LexisNexis / Westlaw flag 30
(1889) 14 AC 384 (1889) 14 AC 384 United Kingdom circa 1889 LexisNexis / Westlaw flag 1
Keshav Mills Ltd v Commissioner of Income-Tax, Bombay [1953] INSC 6; [1953] SCR 950; AIR 1953 SC 187 Supreme Court of India India 30 Jan 1953 LIIofIndia flag 3
Dublin Corporation v M'Adam 2 Tax Cas 387 United Kingdom circa 1953 flag 9
Ostime v Pontypridd and Rhondda Joint Water Board 28 Tax Cas 261 United Kingdom circa 1953 flag 6
D '; she also carried on a separate activity, racing stables, which gave rise to no liability to tax being a " recreational " enterprise Horses were bred at the stud farm for the racing stables On the transfer of five horses in the relevant year of assessment from the stud to the stables it was held by the House of Lords (Lord Oaksey dissenting) that " where a person carrying on a trade disposes of part of his stock in trade not by way of sale in the course of trade but for his own use, enjoyment, or recreation, he must bring into his trading account for income-tax purposes the market value of that stock in trade at the time of such disposition, and that, accordingly, the amount to be credited to the stud farm accounts on the transfer of the horses was their market value and not the (1) India - Uttar Pradesh circa 1946 flag 1
Ram Lal Bechairam v Commissioner of Income-tax AIR 1946 All 3 India - Uttar Pradesh circa 1946 flag 1
Bhagwat Ram v Mst Sahib Devi [1922] ILR 3 circa 1922 7
[1933] SCR 950 [1933] SCR 950 circa 1933 1
Anglo-French Textile Co Ltd v Commissioner of Income Tax, Madras [1954] SCR 523 circa 1954 3
Watson Brothers v Hornby 168 LT 109 United Kingdom circa 1946 flag 3
Sir Kikabhai Premchand v Commissioner of Income-tax (Central), Bombay [1954] SCR 219 circa 1954 5
Carlisle And Silloth Golf Club v Smith (1913) 6 Tax Cas 198 United Kingdom circa 1913 flag 5
Krishna Patter v Seetharama Patter [1927] ILR 50 circa 1927 5

LawCite: Privacy | Disclaimers | Conditions of Use | Acknowledgements | Feedback