LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback

Law
Cite


Cases Referring to this Case | Law Reform Reports Referring to this Case | Law Journal Articles Referring to this Case | Legislation Cited | Cases and Articles Cited

Help

Interpretación prejudicial de los art culos 81, 82 literal h), 83 literales a) y e) y 95 de la Decisión 344; 134, 135 literales b) e i) y 136 literal a) de la Decisión 486 de la Comisión del Acuerdo de Cartagena, solicitada por la Primera Sala del Tribunal de lo Contencioso Administrativo, Distrito Nº 1, Quito, República del Ecuador. Interpretación de oficio del literal a) del art culo 82 y del art culo 84 también de la Decisión 344. Actor: ENRIQUE BERNAT F. S.A. Marca: "CHUPA gr fica en colores" (PROCESO Nº 100-IP-2002)   flag 

[2002] ACCJ 111
Court of Justice of the Andean Community
International
27th November, 2002

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name †  Citation(s) Court Jurisdiction Date Full Text Citation Index
1 Equitable Lawyer 1 1 Equitable Lawyer 1 Equitable Lawyer United Kingdom flag 2
3 Equitable Lawyer 20 3 Equitable Lawyer 20 Equitable Lawyer United Kingdom flag 1
4 Equitable Lawyer 26 4 Equitable Lawyer 26 Equitable Lawyer United Kingdom flag 3
5 Equitable Lawyer 15 5 Equitable Lawyer 15 Equitable Lawyer United Kingdom flag 1
6 Equitable Lawyer 19 6 Equitable Lawyer 19 Equitable Lawyer United Kingdom flag 2

LawCite: Privacy | Disclaimers | Conditions of Use | Acknowledgements | Feedback