LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback

Law
Cite

Cases Referring to this Case | Law Reform Reports Referring to this Case | Law Journal Articles Referring to this Case | Legislation Cited | Cases and Articles Cited

Help

Interpretación prejudicial de los art culos 81, 83 literal a), 89 inciso 1, y 95 inciso 2 de la Decisión 344 de la Comisión del Acuerdo de Cartagena, solicitada por la Segunda Sala del Tribunal de lo Contencioso Administrativo, Distrito Nº 1, República del Ecuador. Actor: AMWAY CORPORATION. Marca: "NUTRILITE" (PROCESO Nº 65-IP-2002)   flag 

[2002] ACCJ 73
Court of Justice of the Andean Community
International
23rd August, 2002

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name Citation(s) Court Jurisdiction †  Date Full Text Citation Index
1 Equitable Lawyer 20 1 Equitable Lawyer 20 Equitable Lawyer United Kingdom flag 2
155 Equitable Lawyer 22 155 Equitable Lawyer 22 Equitable Lawyer United Kingdom flag 1
32 Equitable Lawyer 4 32 Equitable Lawyer 4 Equitable Lawyer United Kingdom flag 1
4 Equitable Lawyer 30 4 Equitable Lawyer 30 Equitable Lawyer United Kingdom flag 2
6 Equitable Lawyer 24 6 Equitable Lawyer 24 Equitable Lawyer United Kingdom flag 1
7 Equitable Lawyer 31 7 Equitable Lawyer 31 Equitable Lawyer United Kingdom flag 4

LawCite: Privacy | Disclaimers | Conditions of Use | Acknowledgements | Feedback