LawCite Search |
LawCite Markup Tool |
Help |
Feedback
Law Cite |
Legislation Name | Provision |
Constitution |
Case Name | Citation(s) | Court | Jurisdiction | Date | Full Text | Citation Index † | |
Secretary of the State " had been allowed to remain It appears to me that the words to that effect were not provided for in Sec 175(3) of the Act or Art 299(1) of the Constitution because the same were unnecessary and redundant The provisions of Section 175(3) and Art 299(1) of the Constitution are mandatory and it is well established that if a particular thing is required to be done in a particular manner, it shall be done in that manner or not at all (See Nazir Ahmad Vs Emperor |
|
Privy Council | India | circa 1936 |
|
||
A Damodaran & Anr v Kerala |
[1976] INSC 75; |
Supreme Court of India | India | 23 Mar 1976 | LIIofIndia |
|
|
(1976) 4 SCC 497 |
|
circa 1976 |
|
||||
Air 1964 All 128 |
|
India - Uttar Pradesh | circa 1964 |
|