|
Ramesh Chandra v "v R Daga 20 the Supreme Court held that strict proof of perf?rmance of essential rites is not reqUired It further tried to distinguish between the legality arid the morality of relationships It observed that ke~ping in consideration the present statutory Hindu law, a bigamous marriage may be declared 17 18 19 ,20 Savitaben Somabhai Bhatya v Gujarat
|
AIR 2005 SC 1809
|
Supreme Court of India
|
India
|
circa 2005
|
|
|
 4
|
|
SMT Yamunabai Anantra Adhav v Ranantra Shivram Adhav & Anr
|
[1988] INSC 24; (1988) 1 SCC 530; 1988 1 SCALE 184; 1988 1 JT 193; 1988 2 SCR 809; AIR 1988 SC 644
|
Supreme Court of India
|
India
|
27 Jan 1988
|
LIIofIndia
|
|
22 
|
|
Ramesh Chander Kaushal v Veena Kaushal
|
[1978] INSC 93; (1978) 4 SCC 70; 1978 3 SCR 782; AIR 1978 SC 1807
|
Supreme Court of India
|
India
|
27 Apr 1978
|
LIIofIndia
|
|
10
|
|
Lnanak Chand v Shri Chandra Kishore Agarwala
|
[1969] INSC 141; [1970] 1 SCR 565; 1969 3 SCC 802; AIR 1970 SC 446
|
Supreme Court of India
|
India
|
20 May 1969
|
LIIofIndia
|
|
10
|
|
[1952] SC 231
|
[1952] SC 231
|
|
United Kingdom - Scotland
|
circa 1952
|
|
|
1
|
|
Air 1929 PC 135
|
AIR 1929 PC 135
|
Privy Council
|
India
|
circa 1929
|
|
|
9
|
|
7 SCC 675
|
7 SCC 675
|
|
|
circa 2005
|
|
|
1
|
|
6 AC 364
|
6 AC 364
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
LexisNexis / Westlaw
|
|
6
|
|
3 SCC 527
|
3 SCC 527
|
|
|
circa 2005
|
|
|
5
|
|
2 SCC 556
|
2 SCC 556
|
|
|
circa 2005
|
|
|
4
|
|
2 HL 269
|
2 HL 269
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
3
|
